‘What ought to belong to merit only’: Debating Status and Heredity in the New American Republic

Despite the critique of monarchy and aristocracy that contributed to American Revolutionary rhetoric, not all revolutionaries dismissed the idea of hereditary status. During the 1780s a debate emerged over the proper nature of status and the true location of social power in the new republic, instiga...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal for eighteenth-century studies 2017-06, Vol.40 (2), p.181-198
1. Verfasser: Cutterham, Tom
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Despite the critique of monarchy and aristocracy that contributed to American Revolutionary rhetoric, not all revolutionaries dismissed the idea of hereditary status. During the 1780s a debate emerged over the proper nature of status and the true location of social power in the new republic, instigated by a new organisation: the Society of the Cincinnati. Subject to withering attacks in its earliest years, the Cincinnati also generated spirited defences. The controversy challenged the dominance of oppositional republican ideology and, in the context of political and economic change, helped some Americans develop a new understanding of power and legitimacy.
ISSN:1754-0194
1754-0208
DOI:10.1111/1754-0208.12409