First Principles and Practical Politics: Thoughts on Judge Pryor’s Proposal to Revive Presumptive Federal Sentencing Guidelines
In recent remarks to the American Law Institute, Judge William Pryor recommended abandonment of the post-"Booker" advisory version of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and adoption of a simplified presumptive federal guidelines system. Here, Bowman relates that he has been making variants...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Federal sentencing reporter 2017-02, Vol.29 (2/3), p.126-130 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 130 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2/3 |
container_start_page | 126 |
container_title | Federal sentencing reporter |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | BOWMAN, FRANK O. |
description | In recent remarks to the American Law Institute, Judge William Pryor recommended abandonment of the post-"Booker" advisory version of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and adoption of a simplified presumptive federal guidelines system. Here, Bowman relates that he has been making variants of the same argument for the past ten years--as co-reporter to the Constitution Project's bipartisan sentencing initiative, as a contributor in the Model Sentencing Guidelines Working Group that in 2006 wrote and published a set of simplified Booker-compliant guidelines, as a witness before the US Sentencing Commission, and in his private academic capacity. He also explains why he now feels skepticism about Judge Pryor's proposals. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1525/fsr.2017.29.2-3.126 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1881727050</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26377046</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26377046</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c940-cb0ae0b07acf71d468dc1e40b4f15c76d4925e15a003249da0db7b38778768aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AhEWPHhKnfyd9CiLq8KCe9h7SNMUWmpbk-7Bb2-Wiqd5w7w3D36E3DMomOLquUmx4MCw4GXBqSgY1xdkxZQQ1AgtLrMGJWhpNF6Tm5Q6AJBS8hV52rUxzZtDbAffTn1IGzfUeXV-br3rN4exb7NKt-SqcX0Kd39zTY671-P2ne4_3z62L3vqSwnUV-ACVIDON8hqqU3tWZBQyYYpj7qWJVeBKQcguCxrB3WFlTCIBrVxTqzJ4_J2iuP3KaTZduMpDrnRMmMYcgQF2SUWl49jSjE0dortl4s_loE9A7EZiD0Dsby03AqbgeTUw5Lq0jzG_0i-IILU4hczq1xm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1881727050</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>First Principles and Practical Politics: Thoughts on Judge Pryor’s Proposal to Revive Presumptive Federal Sentencing Guidelines</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>BOWMAN, FRANK O.</creator><creatorcontrib>BOWMAN, FRANK O.</creatorcontrib><description>In recent remarks to the American Law Institute, Judge William Pryor recommended abandonment of the post-"Booker" advisory version of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and adoption of a simplified presumptive federal guidelines system. Here, Bowman relates that he has been making variants of the same argument for the past ten years--as co-reporter to the Constitution Project's bipartisan sentencing initiative, as a contributor in the Model Sentencing Guidelines Working Group that in 2006 wrote and published a set of simplified Booker-compliant guidelines, as a witness before the US Sentencing Commission, and in his private academic capacity. He also explains why he now feels skepticism about Judge Pryor's proposals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-9867</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-8363</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1525/fsr.2017.29.2-3.126</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: University of California Press</publisher><subject>A GUIDELINES PROPOSAL ; Criminal sentences ; Judges & magistrates ; Pessimism ; Proposals ; Pryor, William H Jr</subject><ispartof>Federal sentencing reporter, 2017-02, Vol.29 (2/3), p.126-130</ispartof><rights>2017 Vera Institute of Justice</rights><rights>Copyright University of California Press Dec 2016-Feb 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26377046$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26377046$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BOWMAN, FRANK O.</creatorcontrib><title>First Principles and Practical Politics: Thoughts on Judge Pryor’s Proposal to Revive Presumptive Federal Sentencing Guidelines</title><title>Federal sentencing reporter</title><description>In recent remarks to the American Law Institute, Judge William Pryor recommended abandonment of the post-"Booker" advisory version of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and adoption of a simplified presumptive federal guidelines system. Here, Bowman relates that he has been making variants of the same argument for the past ten years--as co-reporter to the Constitution Project's bipartisan sentencing initiative, as a contributor in the Model Sentencing Guidelines Working Group that in 2006 wrote and published a set of simplified Booker-compliant guidelines, as a witness before the US Sentencing Commission, and in his private academic capacity. He also explains why he now feels skepticism about Judge Pryor's proposals.</description><subject>A GUIDELINES PROPOSAL</subject><subject>Criminal sentences</subject><subject>Judges & magistrates</subject><subject>Pessimism</subject><subject>Proposals</subject><subject>Pryor, William H Jr</subject><issn>1053-9867</issn><issn>1533-8363</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AhEWPHhKnfyd9CiLq8KCe9h7SNMUWmpbk-7Bb2-Wiqd5w7w3D36E3DMomOLquUmx4MCw4GXBqSgY1xdkxZQQ1AgtLrMGJWhpNF6Tm5Q6AJBS8hV52rUxzZtDbAffTn1IGzfUeXV-br3rN4exb7NKt-SqcX0Kd39zTY671-P2ne4_3z62L3vqSwnUV-ACVIDON8hqqU3tWZBQyYYpj7qWJVeBKQcguCxrB3WFlTCIBrVxTqzJ4_J2iuP3KaTZduMpDrnRMmMYcgQF2SUWl49jSjE0dortl4s_loE9A7EZiD0Dsby03AqbgeTUw5Lq0jzG_0i-IILU4hczq1xm</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>BOWMAN, FRANK O.</creator><general>University of California Press</general><general>University of California Press Books Division</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>First Principles and Practical Politics</title><author>BOWMAN, FRANK O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c940-cb0ae0b07acf71d468dc1e40b4f15c76d4925e15a003249da0db7b38778768aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>A GUIDELINES PROPOSAL</topic><topic>Criminal sentences</topic><topic>Judges & magistrates</topic><topic>Pessimism</topic><topic>Proposals</topic><topic>Pryor, William H Jr</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BOWMAN, FRANK O.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Federal sentencing reporter</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BOWMAN, FRANK O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>First Principles and Practical Politics: Thoughts on Judge Pryor’s Proposal to Revive Presumptive Federal Sentencing Guidelines</atitle><jtitle>Federal sentencing reporter</jtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2/3</issue><spage>126</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>126-130</pages><issn>1053-9867</issn><eissn>1533-8363</eissn><abstract>In recent remarks to the American Law Institute, Judge William Pryor recommended abandonment of the post-"Booker" advisory version of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and adoption of a simplified presumptive federal guidelines system. Here, Bowman relates that he has been making variants of the same argument for the past ten years--as co-reporter to the Constitution Project's bipartisan sentencing initiative, as a contributor in the Model Sentencing Guidelines Working Group that in 2006 wrote and published a set of simplified Booker-compliant guidelines, as a witness before the US Sentencing Commission, and in his private academic capacity. He also explains why he now feels skepticism about Judge Pryor's proposals.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>University of California Press</pub><doi>10.1525/fsr.2017.29.2-3.126</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-9867 |
ispartof | Federal sentencing reporter, 2017-02, Vol.29 (2/3), p.126-130 |
issn | 1053-9867 1533-8363 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1881727050 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | A GUIDELINES PROPOSAL Criminal sentences Judges & magistrates Pessimism Proposals Pryor, William H Jr |
title | First Principles and Practical Politics: Thoughts on Judge Pryor’s Proposal to Revive Presumptive Federal Sentencing Guidelines |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A19%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=First%20Principles%20and%20Practical%20Politics:%20Thoughts%20on%20Judge%20Pryor%E2%80%99s%20Proposal%20to%20Revive%20Presumptive%20Federal%20Sentencing%20Guidelines&rft.jtitle=Federal%20sentencing%20reporter&rft.au=BOWMAN,%20FRANK%20O.&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2/3&rft.spage=126&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=126-130&rft.issn=1053-9867&rft.eissn=1533-8363&rft_id=info:doi/10.1525/fsr.2017.29.2-3.126&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26377046%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1881727050&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26377046&rfr_iscdi=true |