First Principles and Practical Politics: Thoughts on Judge Pryor’s Proposal to Revive Presumptive Federal Sentencing Guidelines
In recent remarks to the American Law Institute, Judge William Pryor recommended abandonment of the post-"Booker" advisory version of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and adoption of a simplified presumptive federal guidelines system. Here, Bowman relates that he has been making variants...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Federal sentencing reporter 2017-02, Vol.29 (2/3), p.126-130 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In recent remarks to the American Law Institute, Judge William Pryor recommended abandonment of the post-"Booker" advisory version of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and adoption of a simplified presumptive federal guidelines system. Here, Bowman relates that he has been making variants of the same argument for the past ten years--as co-reporter to the Constitution Project's bipartisan sentencing initiative, as a contributor in the Model Sentencing Guidelines Working Group that in 2006 wrote and published a set of simplified Booker-compliant guidelines, as a witness before the US Sentencing Commission, and in his private academic capacity. He also explains why he now feels skepticism about Judge Pryor's proposals. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1053-9867 1533-8363 |
DOI: | 10.1525/fsr.2017.29.2-3.126 |