Comparing Bioalcohols Production from Olive Pruning Biomass by Biotechnological Pathway with Candida guilliermondii and Pichia stipitis

After acid hydrolysis with H 2 SO 4 from olive pruning, subsequent fermentations were carried out in order to compare two non-traditional yeasts: Candida guilliermondii and Pichia stipitis . During the fermentations, sugar uptake as well as ethanol and xylitol production were determined. However, bo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Waste and biomass valorization 2016-12, Vol.7 (6), p.1369-1375
Hauptverfasser: Moya, Alberto J., Mateo, Soledad, Puentes, Juan G., Fonseca, Bruno G., Roberto, Inês C., Sánchez, Sebastián
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:After acid hydrolysis with H 2 SO 4 from olive pruning, subsequent fermentations were carried out in order to compare two non-traditional yeasts: Candida guilliermondii and Pichia stipitis . During the fermentations, sugar uptake as well as ethanol and xylitol production were determined. However, both yeast employed for the biotransformations showed different behaviours; C. guilliermondii produced ethanol from D -glucose and xylitol from D -xylose but, in contrast, P. stipitis only was able to produce ethanol from hexoses and pentoses although, due to the inhibitors amount (acetic acid and polyphenols mainly), it required a detoxification step. To solve this problem, activated charcoal treatment as well as a vacuum evaporation process (concentration ratio 2.7) were performed as physical detoxification methods with positive results. The maximum ethanol and xylitol yields ( Y P / S ) (calculated on consumed sugars) obtained with C. guilliermondii were 0.38 and 0.31 kg kg - 1 respectively; while P. stipitis was able to produce 0.33 kg of ethanol per kg of fermentable sugar.
ISSN:1877-2641
1877-265X
DOI:10.1007/s12649-016-9531-3