Comparing Bioalcohols Production from Olive Pruning Biomass by Biotechnological Pathway with Candida guilliermondii and Pichia stipitis
After acid hydrolysis with H 2 SO 4 from olive pruning, subsequent fermentations were carried out in order to compare two non-traditional yeasts: Candida guilliermondii and Pichia stipitis . During the fermentations, sugar uptake as well as ethanol and xylitol production were determined. However, bo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Waste and biomass valorization 2016-12, Vol.7 (6), p.1369-1375 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | After acid hydrolysis with
H
2
SO
4
from olive pruning, subsequent fermentations were carried out in order to compare two non-traditional yeasts:
Candida guilliermondii
and
Pichia stipitis
. During the fermentations, sugar uptake as well as ethanol and xylitol production were determined. However, both yeast employed for the biotransformations showed different behaviours;
C. guilliermondii
produced ethanol from
D
-glucose and xylitol from
D
-xylose but, in contrast,
P. stipitis
only was able to produce ethanol from hexoses and pentoses although, due to the inhibitors amount (acetic acid and polyphenols mainly), it required a detoxification step. To solve this problem, activated charcoal treatment as well as a vacuum evaporation process (concentration ratio 2.7) were performed as physical detoxification methods with positive results. The maximum ethanol and xylitol yields (
Y
P
/
S
) (calculated on consumed sugars) obtained with
C. guilliermondii
were 0.38 and 0.31 kg
kg
-
1
respectively; while
P. stipitis
was able to produce 0.33 kg of ethanol per kg of fermentable sugar. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1877-2641 1877-265X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12649-016-9531-3 |