Why computation need not be traded only for internal representation
Although Clark & Thornton's “trading spaces” hypothesis is supposed to require trading internal representation for computation, it is not used consistently in that fashion. Not only do some of the offered computation-saving strategies turn out to be nonrepresentational, others (e.g., cultur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Behavioral and brain sciences 1997-03, Vol.20 (1), p.80-81 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Although Clark & Thornton's “trading
spaces” hypothesis is supposed to require trading internal
representation for computation, it is not used consistently in that
fashion. Not only do some of the offered computation-saving strategies
turn out to be nonrepresentational, others (e.g., cultural artifacts)
are external representations. Hence, C&T's hypothesis is
consistent with antirepresentationalism. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0140-525X 1469-1825 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S0140525X9740002X |