Total Ionizing Dose Response of Hafnium-Oxide Based MOS Devices to Low-Dose-Rate Gamma Ray Radiation Observed by Pulse CV and On-Site Measurements
This paper reports on the low-dose-rate radiation response of Al-HfO 2 /SiO 2 -Si MOS devices, where the gate dielectric was formed by atomic layer deposition with 4.7 nm equivalent oxide thickness. The degradation of the devices was characterized by a pulse capacitance-voltage (CV) and on-site radi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on nuclear science 2017-01, Vol.64 (1), p.673-682 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This paper reports on the low-dose-rate radiation response of Al-HfO 2 /SiO 2 -Si MOS devices, where the gate dielectric was formed by atomic layer deposition with 4.7 nm equivalent oxide thickness. The degradation of the devices was characterized by a pulse capacitance-voltage (CV) and on-site radiation response techniques under continuous gamma (γ) ray exposure at a relatively low-dose-rate of 0.116 rad(HfO 2 )/s. A significant variation of the flat-band voltage shift of up to ± 1.1 V under positive and negative biased irradiation, with the total dose of up to 40 krad (HfO 2 ) and the electric field of ~0.5 MV/cm, has been measured on the HfO 2 -based MOS devices using the proposed techniques, not apparent by conventional CV measurements. The large flat-band voltage shift is mainly attributed to the radiation-induced oxide trapped charges, which are not readily compensated by bias-induced charges produced over the measurement timescales of less than 5 ms. Analysis of the experimental results suggest that both hole and electron trapping can dominate the radiation response performance of the HfO 2 -based MOS devices depending on the applied bias. No distinct loop width variation has been found with irradiation in all cases. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0018-9499 1558-1578 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TNS.2016.2633549 |