Qanat: a resource or a hazard? Rebuttal to “Qanat is not a hazard” by Parise (Environ Earth Sci 2016 75: 1476)
A reply essay is presented on the rebuttal article by Parise (Environ Earth Sci 75(23):1476, 2016 ) suggesting that qanat is not a hazard. It is presented as a refutation on the paper by Abbasnejad et al. (Environ Earth Sci 75:1306, 2016 ) in which the authors have explained the etiology, the impact...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental earth sciences 2017-03, Vol.76 (5), p.1, Article 214 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A reply essay is presented on the rebuttal article by Parise (Environ Earth Sci 75(23):1476,
2016
) suggesting that qanat is not a hazard. It is presented as a refutation on the paper by Abbasnejad et al. (Environ Earth Sci 75:1306,
2016
) in which the authors have explained the etiology, the impacts and remedies of a qanat hazard in Iranian urban areas. Since the majority of qanats in Iranian urban areas are abandoned, useless and threatening, according to definition and in comparison with similar features introduced as a hazard, they are considered as a hazard too. However, this does not mean, and Abbasnejad et al. (in Environ Earth Sci 75:1306,
2016
) have not claimed, that all qanats are hazardous. In addition, the authors who have studied qanats in Iranian urban areas, before Abbasnejad et al. (in Environ Earth Sci 75:1306,
2016
), have also considered qanats as a hazard. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1866-6280 1866-6299 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12665-017-6526-8 |