Why the interpretation of “Measuring propagation speed of Coulomb fields” stands

The experimental findings reported in our original paper de Sangro et al. (Eur. Phys. J. C 75:137, 2015 ) have been criticized in Shabad (Eur. Phys. J. C 76:508, 2016 ). We believe that the arguments brought in Shabad (Eur. Phys. J. C 76:508, 2016 ) are not correct and we show evidence for this.

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields Particles and fields, 2017-02, Vol.77 (2), p.1, Article 75
Hauptverfasser:	de Sangro, R., Finocchiaro, G., Patteri, P., Piccolo, M., Pizzella, G.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Astronomy Astrophysics and Cosmology Electromagnetic radiation Elementary Particles Hadrons Heavy Ions Measurement Measurement Science and Instrumentation Nuclear Energy Nuclear Physics Physics Physics and Astronomy Quantum Field Theories Quantum Field Theory Reply Sensors String Theory
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	The experimental findings reported in our original paper de Sangro et al. (Eur. Phys. J. C 75:137, 2015 ) have been criticized in Shabad (Eur. Phys. J. C 76:508, 2016 ). We believe that the arguments brought in Shabad (Eur. Phys. J. C 76:508, 2016 ) are not correct and we show evidence for this.
ISSN:	1434-6044 1434-6052
DOI:	10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4650-y