Preserving rapid prototypes: a review
Rapid Prototyping (RP) has revolutionized the world of manufacturing. It has gained popularity among designers and artists, having developed from a visualization tool to a manufacturing tool for end-use products. Rapid-prototyped objects are being accessed by museums and the technology is being adop...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Heritage science 2016-11, Vol.4 (1), p.1, Article 40 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Heritage science |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Coon, Carolien Pretzel, Boris Lomax, Tom Strlič, Matija |
description | Rapid Prototyping (RP) has revolutionized the world of manufacturing. It has gained popularity among designers and artists, having developed from a visualization tool to a manufacturing tool for end-use products. Rapid-prototyped objects are being accessed by museums and the technology is being adopted for conservation applications. The review identifies the current most commonly used polymer based RP technologies and materials that are likely to enter museum collections, and formulates informed research topics related to their conservation. A knowledge exchange project was conducted with artists and designers using the technology via an online survey and interviews. The main technologies and materials used by artists and designers were identified and investigated including research that has been done into the stability of RP manufactured objects. Since these may be uniquely post-processed by artists and designers, RP objects are often irreplaceable, i.e. cannot simply be reprinted. The evolution from rapid prototyping (RP) to additive manufacturing (AM) has resulted in extensive research into the mechanical properties and short-term stability of prototypes. However, very little research has been conducted into RP from the conservation perspective particularly long-term stability studies. Since RP technology is rapidly developing, it is crucial that conservators and scientists follow and inform these developments.
Graphical abstract
Six prints executed in different polymers of an RP artwork “Out of the Cauldron” by the artist Tom Lomax, before and after a photodegradation experiment |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s40494-016-0097-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1863637207</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4311806271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9f0e7ce1ab46a21f2fb3762206f02b6230308269f0ad52e12ad80146cf66f7633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9PwzAMxSMEEtPYB-BWCXEMOE7qtNzQxD9pEhzgHKVtMnWCtSTdUL89mcphF3yxD7_3bD_GLgXcCFHQbVSgSsVBEAcoNR9P2AwhB66Vyk-P5nO2iHEDqcpSIukZu34LLrqwb7frLNi-bbI-dEM3jL2Ld5nNgtu37ueCnXn7Gd3ir8_Zx-PD-_KZr16fXpb3K17LvBx46cHp2glbKbIoPPpKakIE8oAVoQQJBVLCbJOjE2ibAoSi2hN5TVLO2dXkm4743rk4mE23C9u00qQ_JUmNoBMlJqoOXYzBedOH9suG0Qgwh0DMFIhJgZhDIGZMGpw0MbHbtQtHzv-KfgHLJWFk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1863637207</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preserving rapid prototypes: a review</title><source>Nature Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</source><creator>Coon, Carolien ; Pretzel, Boris ; Lomax, Tom ; Strlič, Matija</creator><creatorcontrib>Coon, Carolien ; Pretzel, Boris ; Lomax, Tom ; Strlič, Matija</creatorcontrib><description>Rapid Prototyping (RP) has revolutionized the world of manufacturing. It has gained popularity among designers and artists, having developed from a visualization tool to a manufacturing tool for end-use products. Rapid-prototyped objects are being accessed by museums and the technology is being adopted for conservation applications. The review identifies the current most commonly used polymer based RP technologies and materials that are likely to enter museum collections, and formulates informed research topics related to their conservation. A knowledge exchange project was conducted with artists and designers using the technology via an online survey and interviews. The main technologies and materials used by artists and designers were identified and investigated including research that has been done into the stability of RP manufactured objects. Since these may be uniquely post-processed by artists and designers, RP objects are often irreplaceable, i.e. cannot simply be reprinted. The evolution from rapid prototyping (RP) to additive manufacturing (AM) has resulted in extensive research into the mechanical properties and short-term stability of prototypes. However, very little research has been conducted into RP from the conservation perspective particularly long-term stability studies. Since RP technology is rapidly developing, it is crucial that conservators and scientists follow and inform these developments.
Graphical abstract
Six prints executed in different polymers of an RP artwork “Out of the Cauldron” by the artist Tom Lomax, before and after a photodegradation experiment</description><identifier>ISSN: 2050-7445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2050-7445</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40494-016-0097-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science ; Materials Science ; Review</subject><ispartof>Heritage science, 2016-11, Vol.4 (1), p.1, Article 40</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>Heritage Science is a copyright of Springer, 2016.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9f0e7ce1ab46a21f2fb3762206f02b6230308269f0ad52e12ad80146cf66f7633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9f0e7ce1ab46a21f2fb3762206f02b6230308269f0ad52e12ad80146cf66f7633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s40494-016-0097-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-016-0097-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,776,780,788,860,27899,27901,27902,41096,42165,51551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coon, Carolien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pretzel, Boris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomax, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strlič, Matija</creatorcontrib><title>Preserving rapid prototypes: a review</title><title>Heritage science</title><addtitle>Herit Sci</addtitle><description>Rapid Prototyping (RP) has revolutionized the world of manufacturing. It has gained popularity among designers and artists, having developed from a visualization tool to a manufacturing tool for end-use products. Rapid-prototyped objects are being accessed by museums and the technology is being adopted for conservation applications. The review identifies the current most commonly used polymer based RP technologies and materials that are likely to enter museum collections, and formulates informed research topics related to their conservation. A knowledge exchange project was conducted with artists and designers using the technology via an online survey and interviews. The main technologies and materials used by artists and designers were identified and investigated including research that has been done into the stability of RP manufactured objects. Since these may be uniquely post-processed by artists and designers, RP objects are often irreplaceable, i.e. cannot simply be reprinted. The evolution from rapid prototyping (RP) to additive manufacturing (AM) has resulted in extensive research into the mechanical properties and short-term stability of prototypes. However, very little research has been conducted into RP from the conservation perspective particularly long-term stability studies. Since RP technology is rapidly developing, it is crucial that conservators and scientists follow and inform these developments.
Graphical abstract
Six prints executed in different polymers of an RP artwork “Out of the Cauldron” by the artist Tom Lomax, before and after a photodegradation experiment</description><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Review</subject><issn>2050-7445</issn><issn>2050-7445</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9PwzAMxSMEEtPYB-BWCXEMOE7qtNzQxD9pEhzgHKVtMnWCtSTdUL89mcphF3yxD7_3bD_GLgXcCFHQbVSgSsVBEAcoNR9P2AwhB66Vyk-P5nO2iHEDqcpSIukZu34LLrqwb7frLNi-bbI-dEM3jL2Ld5nNgtu37ueCnXn7Gd3ir8_Zx-PD-_KZr16fXpb3K17LvBx46cHp2glbKbIoPPpKakIE8oAVoQQJBVLCbJOjE2ibAoSi2hN5TVLO2dXkm4743rk4mE23C9u00qQ_JUmNoBMlJqoOXYzBedOH9suG0Qgwh0DMFIhJgZhDIGZMGpw0MbHbtQtHzv-KfgHLJWFk</recordid><startdate>20161122</startdate><enddate>20161122</enddate><creator>Coon, Carolien</creator><creator>Pretzel, Boris</creator><creator>Lomax, Tom</creator><creator>Strlič, Matija</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161122</creationdate><title>Preserving rapid prototypes: a review</title><author>Coon, Carolien ; Pretzel, Boris ; Lomax, Tom ; Strlič, Matija</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9f0e7ce1ab46a21f2fb3762206f02b6230308269f0ad52e12ad80146cf66f7633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coon, Carolien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pretzel, Boris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomax, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strlič, Matija</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Heritage science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coon, Carolien</au><au>Pretzel, Boris</au><au>Lomax, Tom</au><au>Strlič, Matija</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preserving rapid prototypes: a review</atitle><jtitle>Heritage science</jtitle><stitle>Herit Sci</stitle><date>2016-11-22</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><artnum>40</artnum><issn>2050-7445</issn><eissn>2050-7445</eissn><abstract>Rapid Prototyping (RP) has revolutionized the world of manufacturing. It has gained popularity among designers and artists, having developed from a visualization tool to a manufacturing tool for end-use products. Rapid-prototyped objects are being accessed by museums and the technology is being adopted for conservation applications. The review identifies the current most commonly used polymer based RP technologies and materials that are likely to enter museum collections, and formulates informed research topics related to their conservation. A knowledge exchange project was conducted with artists and designers using the technology via an online survey and interviews. The main technologies and materials used by artists and designers were identified and investigated including research that has been done into the stability of RP manufactured objects. Since these may be uniquely post-processed by artists and designers, RP objects are often irreplaceable, i.e. cannot simply be reprinted. The evolution from rapid prototyping (RP) to additive manufacturing (AM) has resulted in extensive research into the mechanical properties and short-term stability of prototypes. However, very little research has been conducted into RP from the conservation perspective particularly long-term stability studies. Since RP technology is rapidly developing, it is crucial that conservators and scientists follow and inform these developments.
Graphical abstract
Six prints executed in different polymers of an RP artwork “Out of the Cauldron” by the artist Tom Lomax, before and after a photodegradation experiment</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1186/s40494-016-0097-y</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2050-7445 |
ispartof | Heritage science, 2016-11, Vol.4 (1), p.1, Article 40 |
issn | 2050-7445 2050-7445 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1863637207 |
source | Nature Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Springer Nature OA/Free Journals |
subjects | Chemistry and Materials Science Materials Science Review |
title | Preserving rapid prototypes: a review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T10%3A32%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preserving%20rapid%20prototypes:%20a%20review&rft.jtitle=Heritage%20science&rft.au=Coon,%20Carolien&rft.date=2016-11-22&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.artnum=40&rft.issn=2050-7445&rft.eissn=2050-7445&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40494-016-0097-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4311806271%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1863637207&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |