EMERGENCY CRICOTHYROTOMY: REVISED ANATOMY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Objectives & BackgroundEmergency cricothyrotomy is a common feature in all difficult airway algorithms. It is the final step following failed attempts to oxygenate a patient. It is rarely performed and has a significant failure rate. The size of the cricothyroid membrane (CTM) has been previousl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Emergency medicine journal : EMJ 2016-12, Vol.33 (12), p.933-933
Hauptverfasser: Nutbeam, T, Enki, D, Clarke, R, Luff, T, Gay, D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives & BackgroundEmergency cricothyrotomy is a common feature in all difficult airway algorithms. It is the final step following failed attempts to oxygenate a patient. It is rarely performed and has a significant failure rate. The size of the cricothyroid membrane (CTM) has been previously reported in the literature. There is variation in the reported size of this membrane, especially across population groups. Procedure failure may result from a discrepancy between the size of the equipment used and the size of the CTM.MethodsAn initial sample of 61 trauma CT scans were reviewed by two radiologists independently. Electronic calipers were used to measure the maximum height of the CTM. This sample was used to power further data collection by assuming a 5% level of significance with 95% confidence interval and precision of 0.2 mm–further scans were reviewed until a sample size of 478 patients was achieved.ResultsThe median height reported was 5.85 mm (female) and 7.65 mm (male). These dimensions are much smaller than previously reported in the literature for Western patients. The external diameters of commonly used tubes used to pass through the CTM were compared with these measurements.ConclusionThe CTM in this population is smaller than previously reported. Practitioners encountering patients who may require a surgical airway should be aware of this. Rescue airway equipment of a smaller external diameter should be immediately available if required. Figure 1 Table 1Comparison of surgical airway devices, their external diameter and the percentage of population in which CTM height>external diameter of deviceTube TypeExternal Diameter% of population in which CTM height>external diameter of device6 mm836.25 mm6.760.54 mm5.677.63 mm4.293.2Shilley10.87.7Melker8.234.6TracheoQuick586.5
ISSN:1472-0205
1472-0213
DOI:10.1136/emermed-2016-206402.60