Set differentiation and depth of processing in the directed forgetting paradigm

96 university students were shown lists of words, half of which were subsequently cued as to-be-remembered (R) words and half as to-be-forgotten (F) words. The cue occurred immediately before (precue) or after (postcue) a 5-sec interval during which Ss performed 1 of 3 orienting tasks on the item. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Learning and Memory 1980-09, Vol.6 (5), p.599-610
Hauptverfasser: Horton, Keith D, Petruk, Randy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:96 university students were shown lists of words, half of which were subsequently cued as to-be-remembered (R) words and half as to-be-forgotten (F) words. The cue occurred immediately before (precue) or after (postcue) a 5-sec interval during which Ss performed 1 of 3 orienting tasks on the item. The lists were constructed of either unrelated or categorically related words. The latter lists were further partitioned into those in which the R and F cues were either orthogonal or nonorthogonal to category membership. As predicted, recall data reveal that set differentiation was superior with precues and related nonorthogonal lists. The reversal of the typical "depth effect" observed by C. D. Wetzel using the directed forgetting paradigm was not replicated; indeed, quite a strong depth effect was obtained. The fact that set differentiation was enhanced by deeper levels of processing is viewed as contrary to a selective elaborative rehearsal interpretation. (22 ref)
ISSN:0096-1515
0278-7393
2327-9745
1939-1285
DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.6.5.599