Assessment of N2O emissions from rapeseed cultivation in Poland by various approaches
The aim of this study was to compare four tools for calculation of nitrous oxide (N O) emissions under the renewable energy directive. All the tools follow the methodology of the international panel on climate change. The first calculations of N O fluxes were based on the Tier 1 method using the Bio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International Agrophysics 2016-10, Vol.30 (4), p.501-507 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The aim of this study was to compare four tools for calculation of nitrous oxide (N
O) emissions under the renewable energy directive. All the tools follow the methodology of the international panel on climate change. The first calculations of N
O fluxes were based on the Tier 1 method using the BioGrace tool. The second and the third ones followed the Tier 2 methodology, applying the global nitrous oxide calculator and the Lesschen emission factors, respectively. The last assessment was performed in accordance with the Tier 3 approach by using the denitrification- decomposition model. The N
O fluxes were calculated for rapeseed cultivation in a 4-year crop rotation in Poland. The same input data were applied in all methods. The average of N
O emissions varied in the range of 1.99-3.78 kg N
O ha
y
, depending on the approach used (Lesschen emission factors > denitrificationdecomposition > global nitrous oxide calculator > BioGrace). This paper illustrates that, at country level, the Lesschen emission factors method worked as well as the denitrification-decomposition model for Poland. The advantage of this approach is the simplicity of collecting the necessary data, in contrast to process-based modelling. Moreover, the Tier 2 method provides mitigation measures similar to the denitrification-decomposition model, related to crop type, climatic conditions, and management practices. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2300-8725 0236-8722 2300-8725 |
DOI: | 10.1515/intag-2016-0013 |