Preferences for participation in shared decision-making among cataract patients in urban southern China: a cross-sectional study

Abstract Background Shared decision-making is known to facilitate quality care, but little research has been done to explore this issue in mainland China. This study aimed to assess the preferred and perceived involvement in decision-making among patients considering cataract surgery, which is the m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Lancet (British edition) 2016-10, Vol.388, p.S56-S56
Hauptverfasser: Zheng, Yingfeng, MD, Huang, Wenyong, MD, Xiao, Baixiang, MD, Qu, Bo, MD, Peng, Wenyang, MD, Liu, Bin, MD, Jin, Ling, MS, Lamoureux, Ecosse, PhD, Liu, Yizhi, Dr
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Shared decision-making is known to facilitate quality care, but little research has been done to explore this issue in mainland China. This study aimed to assess the preferred and perceived involvement in decision-making among patients considering cataract surgery, which is the most commonly performed procedure worldwide. Methods Patients awaiting cataract surgery were enrolled at a tertiary eye hospital in Guangzhou between May, 2015, and May, 2016, and completed a standardised interview. We measured preferred and perceived decision-making roles as reported by patients, and obtained information regarding their demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, health literacy, and clinical data. The study database had no identifying information, and the ethics review committee of the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center approved the consent procedure. All patients provided written informed consent. Findings We recruited 200 patients, of whom 182 completed the interview. 95 participants (52%) were men with a mean age of 71 years (range 21–90). 161 participants (88%) expressed a desire for engagement in shared decision-making (“mostly the doctor” n=57, “mostly me” n=44, and “doctor and me equally” n=60), whereas 21 (12%) preferred either little input from themselves or from the doctor. For 119 participants (65%) their perceived decision-making role matched their preferred role, whereas 44 (24%) preferred a more active role and 19 (11%) a more passive role. Preferring a more active role was significantly associated with adequate health literacy (odds ratio 3·6, 95% CI 1·5–7·3; p=0·004), but not with gender, education level, visual acuity, and severity of lens opacity. Interpretation New strategies promoting health literacy could improve patients' involvement in decision-making, which might increase patient satisfaction and reduce demand for specialised eye care. Funding National Natural Science Foundation of China (81200685); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81100686); Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China (15570001); and Fundamental Research Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology.
ISSN:0140-6736
1474-547X
DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31983-3