TCT-355 Clinical and Angiographic Outcome of Double Crush Versus Provisional-Stenting Technique in Patients With Distal Unprotected Left Main Disease in the Everolimus Eluting Stent Generation Era

Six to nine-month angiographic FU rate was similar in CS group compared to PS group (95% vs 95%) as well as in-segment restenosis rate (7.1% vs 5.8%). [...]there were no differences in term of one-year clinical outcome between CS and PS patients (cardiac mortality 3.9% vs 4.7%; myocardial infarction...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2016-11, Vol.68 (18), p.B146-B146
Hauptverfasser: Migliorini, Angela, Valenti, Renato, Vergara, Ruben, De gregorio, Maria Grazia, Gabrielli, Eleonora, Aicale, Maria Raffaella, De Vito, Elena, Parodi, Guido, Carrabba, Nazzario, Antoniucci, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Six to nine-month angiographic FU rate was similar in CS group compared to PS group (95% vs 95%) as well as in-segment restenosis rate (7.1% vs 5.8%). [...]there were no differences in term of one-year clinical outcome between CS and PS patients (cardiac mortality 3.9% vs 4.7%; myocardial infarction 1.6% vs 1.4%; target vessel revascularization 5% vs 6.3%; definite/probable stent thrombosis 0.8% vs 1.1%).
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.486