Now what, Doc? Regulation 1924/2006 Applies to Communications to Health Professionals (Case C-19/15)
"0 Then, the Court went on to justify that this conclusion was not contrary to the context or the objectives of the Regulation. [...]it stated that, "the absence of any reference to 'professionals' in [recitals r, 9, r6, 29 and 36, and Article 5(2)] does not mean that that regula...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European food and feed law review 2016, Vol.11 (5), p.415-423 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 423 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 415 |
| container_title | European food and feed law review |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Melchor, Sebastián Romero |
| description | "0 Then, the Court went on to justify that this conclusion was not contrary to the context or the objectives of the Regulation. [...]it stated that, "the absence of any reference to 'professionals' in [recitals r, 9, r6, 29 and 36, and Article 5(2)] does not mean that that regulation does not apply to the situation where a commercial communication is addressed exclusively to health professionals. [...]those health professionals risk forwarding, in all good faith, incorrect information on foods which are the subject of a commercial communication to final consumers with whom they have a relationship. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1829462392</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43958450</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43958450</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j152t-79d36cabec6f1c1b35b80b50ac461b78c51b05b4e69f573904442ab7d36c65b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jl1LwzAUhosoOHQ_QQh4oYJlyclHmysZ9WPCUBG9DkmWupZuqU3K5r-328Rzc-DheV_eo2QEROI0B8KOkxHJBaSQAT5NxiHUeDhKCQAbJYsXv0GbpY636N7bO_TuvvpGx8qvEZHAJoCxQNO2bSoXUPSo8KtVv67sXtmTmdNNXKK3zpcuhIHqJqDrQgeHipTICeE358lJOVA3_vtnyefjw0cxS-evT8_FdJ7WhENMM7mgwmrjrCiJJYZyk2PDsbZMEJPllhODuWFOyJJnVGLGGGiT7VKCG0nPkstDb9v5796FqGrfd7tBiuQgmQAqYbCuDlbjttthr2q7aqW7H-XKslGAiVCYK4x3fRcHsw7Rd_8eo5LnjGP6C7h1Zr4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1829462392</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Now what, Doc? Regulation 1924/2006 Applies to Communications to Health Professionals (Case C-19/15)</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Melchor, Sebastián Romero</creator><creatorcontrib>Melchor, Sebastián Romero</creatorcontrib><description>"0 Then, the Court went on to justify that this conclusion was not contrary to the context or the objectives of the Regulation. [...]it stated that, "the absence of any reference to 'professionals' in [recitals r, 9, r6, 29 and 36, and Article 5(2)] does not mean that that regulation does not apply to the situation where a commercial communication is addressed exclusively to health professionals. [...]those health professionals risk forwarding, in all good faith, incorrect information on foods which are the subject of a commercial communication to final consumers with whom they have a relationship.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1862-2720</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2190-8214</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH</publisher><subject>Advertising ; Advertising restrictions ; Case Note ; Commercial courts ; Commercial regulation ; Communication ; Consumer protection ; Consumers ; European Parliament ; Food ; Food industries ; Food law ; Industrial regulation ; Ingredients ; Law ; Market strategy ; Medical personnel ; Nutrition ; Oral contraceptives ; Professionals</subject><ispartof>European food and feed law review, 2016, Vol.11 (5), p.415-423</ispartof><rights>copyright by Lexxion</rights><rights>Copyright Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43958450$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43958450$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4009,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Melchor, Sebastián Romero</creatorcontrib><title>Now what, Doc? Regulation 1924/2006 Applies to Communications to Health Professionals (Case C-19/15)</title><title>European food and feed law review</title><description>"0 Then, the Court went on to justify that this conclusion was not contrary to the context or the objectives of the Regulation. [...]it stated that, "the absence of any reference to 'professionals' in [recitals r, 9, r6, 29 and 36, and Article 5(2)] does not mean that that regulation does not apply to the situation where a commercial communication is addressed exclusively to health professionals. [...]those health professionals risk forwarding, in all good faith, incorrect information on foods which are the subject of a commercial communication to final consumers with whom they have a relationship.</description><subject>Advertising</subject><subject>Advertising restrictions</subject><subject>Case Note</subject><subject>Commercial courts</subject><subject>Commercial regulation</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Consumer protection</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>European Parliament</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Food law</subject><subject>Industrial regulation</subject><subject>Ingredients</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Market strategy</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Oral contraceptives</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><issn>1862-2720</issn><issn>2190-8214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9jl1LwzAUhosoOHQ_QQh4oYJlyclHmysZ9WPCUBG9DkmWupZuqU3K5r-328Rzc-DheV_eo2QEROI0B8KOkxHJBaSQAT5NxiHUeDhKCQAbJYsXv0GbpY636N7bO_TuvvpGx8qvEZHAJoCxQNO2bSoXUPSo8KtVv67sXtmTmdNNXKK3zpcuhIHqJqDrQgeHipTICeE358lJOVA3_vtnyefjw0cxS-evT8_FdJ7WhENMM7mgwmrjrCiJJYZyk2PDsbZMEJPllhODuWFOyJJnVGLGGGiT7VKCG0nPkstDb9v5796FqGrfd7tBiuQgmQAqYbCuDlbjttthr2q7aqW7H-XKslGAiVCYK4x3fRcHsw7Rd_8eo5LnjGP6C7h1Zr4</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Melchor, Sebastián Romero</creator><general>Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH</general><general>Lexxion Verlag</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>Now what, Doc? Regulation 1924/2006 Applies to Communications to Health Professionals (Case C-19/15)</title><author>Melchor, Sebastián Romero</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j152t-79d36cabec6f1c1b35b80b50ac461b78c51b05b4e69f573904442ab7d36c65b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Advertising</topic><topic>Advertising restrictions</topic><topic>Case Note</topic><topic>Commercial courts</topic><topic>Commercial regulation</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Consumer protection</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>European Parliament</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Food law</topic><topic>Industrial regulation</topic><topic>Ingredients</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Market strategy</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Oral contraceptives</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Melchor, Sebastián Romero</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>European food and feed law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Melchor, Sebastián Romero</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Now what, Doc? Regulation 1924/2006 Applies to Communications to Health Professionals (Case C-19/15)</atitle><jtitle>European food and feed law review</jtitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>415</spage><epage>423</epage><pages>415-423</pages><issn>1862-2720</issn><eissn>2190-8214</eissn><abstract>"0 Then, the Court went on to justify that this conclusion was not contrary to the context or the objectives of the Regulation. [...]it stated that, "the absence of any reference to 'professionals' in [recitals r, 9, r6, 29 and 36, and Article 5(2)] does not mean that that regulation does not apply to the situation where a commercial communication is addressed exclusively to health professionals. [...]those health professionals risk forwarding, in all good faith, incorrect information on foods which are the subject of a commercial communication to final consumers with whom they have a relationship.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH</pub><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1862-2720 |
| ispartof | European food and feed law review, 2016, Vol.11 (5), p.415-423 |
| issn | 1862-2720 2190-8214 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1829462392 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Advertising Advertising restrictions Case Note Commercial courts Commercial regulation Communication Consumer protection Consumers European Parliament Food Food industries Food law Industrial regulation Ingredients Law Market strategy Medical personnel Nutrition Oral contraceptives Professionals |
| title | Now what, Doc? Regulation 1924/2006 Applies to Communications to Health Professionals (Case C-19/15) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T15%3A25%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Now%20what,%20Doc?%20Regulation%201924/2006%20Applies%20to%20Communications%20to%20Health%20Professionals%20(Case%20C-19/15)&rft.jtitle=European%20food%20and%20feed%20law%20review&rft.au=Melchor,%20Sebasti%C3%A1n%20Romero&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=415&rft.epage=423&rft.pages=415-423&rft.issn=1862-2720&rft.eissn=2190-8214&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43958450%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1829462392&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43958450&rfr_iscdi=true |