Now what, Doc? Regulation 1924/2006 Applies to Communications to Health Professionals (Case C-19/15)

"0 Then, the Court went on to justify that this conclusion was not contrary to the context or the objectives of the Regulation. [...]it stated that, "the absence of any reference to 'professionals' in [recitals r, 9, r6, 29 and 36, and Article 5(2)] does not mean that that regula...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European food and feed law review 2016, Vol.11 (5), p.415-423
1. Verfasser: Melchor, Sebastián Romero
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:"0 Then, the Court went on to justify that this conclusion was not contrary to the context or the objectives of the Regulation. [...]it stated that, "the absence of any reference to 'professionals' in [recitals r, 9, r6, 29 and 36, and Article 5(2)] does not mean that that regulation does not apply to the situation where a commercial communication is addressed exclusively to health professionals. [...]those health professionals risk forwarding, in all good faith, incorrect information on foods which are the subject of a commercial communication to final consumers with whom they have a relationship.
ISSN:1862-2720
2190-8214