Now what, Doc? Regulation 1924/2006 Applies to Communications to Health Professionals (Case C-19/15)
"0 Then, the Court went on to justify that this conclusion was not contrary to the context or the objectives of the Regulation. [...]it stated that, "the absence of any reference to 'professionals' in [recitals r, 9, r6, 29 and 36, and Article 5(2)] does not mean that that regula...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European food and feed law review 2016, Vol.11 (5), p.415-423 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | "0 Then, the Court went on to justify that this conclusion was not contrary to the context or the objectives of the Regulation. [...]it stated that, "the absence of any reference to 'professionals' in [recitals r, 9, r6, 29 and 36, and Article 5(2)] does not mean that that regulation does not apply to the situation where a commercial communication is addressed exclusively to health professionals. [...]those health professionals risk forwarding, in all good faith, incorrect information on foods which are the subject of a commercial communication to final consumers with whom they have a relationship. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1862-2720 2190-8214 |