Supreme Court Decision in "Hawkes": A Shot across the Bow

Supreme Court Decision in "Hawkes": A Shot across the Bow

United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc., 474 U.S. 121, 132 (1985). Because it can be difficult to identify WOTUS, project proponents can ask the Corps to issue JDs. Corps, Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02 (June 26, 2008) at 1, 2, 5. Because an AJD is an "official determination,"...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Natural resources & environment 2016-10, Vol.31 (2), p.58-59
Hauptverfasser: Boer, J. Tom, Brown, Samuel L., Levey, Brian R.
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Armed forces
Federal court decisions
Groundwater
Insights
Judicial reviews
Jurisdiction
State court decisions
Supreme Court decisions
Wetlands
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc., 474 U.S. 121, 132 (1985). Because it can be difficult to identify WOTUS, project proponents can ask the Corps to issue JDs. Corps, Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02 (June 26, 2008) at 1, 2, 5. Because an AJD is an "official determination," it is "binding on the Government and represent[s] the Government's position in any subsequent Federal action or litigation."
ISSN:0882-3812
2328-3408