Quantitative and qualitative assessment of real world data comparative effectiveness research of systemic therapies in lung oncology: A systematic review

Highlights • Systematic review of comparative effectiveness research (CER) in lung oncology. • Quality assessment of observational CER studies using the GRACE checklist. • Identification of common shortcomings of observational CER research. • Recommendations for future observational CER research bas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Cancer epidemiology 2016-10, Vol.44, p.5-15
Hauptverfasser:	Peters, Bas J.M., PhD PharmD, Janssen, Vivi E.M.T., BSc, Schramel, Franz M., MD PhD, van de Garde, Ewoudt M.W., PharmD PhD
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Cancer Cancer therapies Comparative effectiveness research Comparative Effectiveness Research - methods Epidemiology Full text Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Internal Medicine Lung cancer Lung Neoplasms - drug therapy Lung Neoplasms - therapy Lung oncology Methods Mortality Multivariate analysis Observational research Oncology Population Quality Real world data Statistical analysis Studies Systematic review
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Highlights • Systematic review of comparative effectiveness research (CER) in lung oncology. • Quality assessment of observational CER studies using the GRACE checklist. • Identification of common shortcomings of observational CER research. • Recommendations for future observational CER research based on findings.
ISSN:	1877-7821 1877-783X
DOI:	10.1016/j.canep.2016.07.005