Primed codeswitching in spontaneous bilingual dialogue

•We investigate structural priming in a new domain: spontaneous codeswitching.•The tendency to codeswitch and structure of codeswitched utterances can be primed.•Key discoveries from priming research (including lexical boost effects) also apply.•The findings reveal many commonalities with monolingua...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of memory and language 2016-12, Vol.91, p.181-201
Hauptverfasser: Fricke, Melinda, Kootstra, Gerrit Jan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We investigate structural priming in a new domain: spontaneous codeswitching.•The tendency to codeswitch and structure of codeswitched utterances can be primed.•Key discoveries from priming research (including lexical boost effects) also apply.•The findings reveal many commonalities with monolingual production planning. Structural priming has played an important role in research on both monolingual and bilingual language production. However, studies of bilingual priming have mainly used priming as an experimental tool, focusing on cross-language priming between single-language sentences, which is a relatively infrequent form of communication in real life. We investigated priming in spontaneous bilingual dialogue, focusing on a hallmark of bilingual language use: codeswitching. Based on quantitative analyses of a large corpus of English–Spanish language use (the Bangor Miami Corpus; Deuchar, Davies, Herring, Parafita Couto, & Carter, 2014), we found that key discoveries from the structural priming literature also apply to bilinguals’ codeswitching behavior, in terms of both the tendency to codeswitch and the grammatical frame of codeswitched utterances. Our results provide novel insights into the different levels and modes of speech at which priming mechanisms are at work, and they illuminate the differences and commonalities between monolingual and bilingual language production.
ISSN:0749-596X
1096-0821
DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2016.04.003