Eutanasia, estado constitucional y democracia: la validez de los argumentos religiosos en las decisiones de la Corte Constitucional colombiana a la luz de la propuesta de Habermas sobre el rol de la religión en la esfera pública

This product of a research turns around the question related to the position of Colombian Constitutional Court in relation to religious arguments to support and express its decisions in some controversial cases. In order to analyze such a problem, it has been proposed to tackle a systematic and crit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Opinión jurídica 2015-01, Vol.14 (27), p.53
Hauptverfasser: Roman, Javier Aguirre, Rojas, Alonso Silva, Mantilla, Ana Patricia Pabon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:spa
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This product of a research turns around the question related to the position of Colombian Constitutional Court in relation to religious arguments to support and express its decisions in some controversial cases. In order to analyze such a problem, it has been proposed to tackle a systematic and critical interpretation of a concrete aspect of J...rgen Habermas' philosophy, that is to say, his proposal about the role of religion in public affairs. The reflection in this first product focuses in the description of the proposed arguments analysis in the constitutional within the Constitutional Court, resulting in Sentence C-239, 1997, which decided on the demand against article 326, Decree 100, 1980- Criminal Code at that time -, referring to criminal type ''homicide for pity'' (or euthanasia) at the light of the proposed theoretical referent.
ISSN:1692-2530
2248-4078