Rationale and Design of the R andomized E valuation of Patients with S table Angina C omparing U tilization of Noninvasive E xaminations (RESCUE) Trial

Abstract RESCUE is a phase III, randomized, controlled, multicenter, comparative efficacy study, designed to compare two diagnostic imaging/treatment paradigms that use coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) or single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American heart journal 2016-09, Vol.179, p.19
Hauptverfasser: Stillman, Arthur E., MD, PhD, Gatsonis, Constantine, PhD, Lima, João A.C., MD, Black, William C., MD, Cormack, Jean, PhD, Gareen, Ilana, PhD, Hoffmann, Udo, MD, MPH, Liu, Tao, PhD, Mavromatis, Kreton, MD, Schnall, Mitchell D., MD, PhD, Udelson, James E., MD, Woodard, Pamela K., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract RESCUE is a phase III, randomized, controlled, multicenter, comparative efficacy study, designed to compare two diagnostic imaging/treatment paradigms that use coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) or single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI) for assisting in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease in patients with stable angina symptoms, and guiding subsequent treatment. The study is based on the hypothesis that CCTA as a diagnostic tool is associated with no increase in cardiac risk, decreased cost, and reduced radiation exposure compared with SPECT MPI. The RESCUE trial was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) Fund for Imaging Innovation, began in 2011, and completed in 2014.
ISSN:0002-8703
1097-6744
DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2016.06.003