Insights into the Interface Between the Electrolytic Solution and the Gold Core in Molecular Au25 Clusters
We used a large series of Au25(SCnH2n+1)180 clusters (n=2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18) to study the effect of n and the presence of electrolytes on the redox potentials. The electrochemical results were analyzed in the framework of concentric‐capacitor models that were previously proposed to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ChemElectroChem 2016-08, Vol.3 (8), p.1237-1244 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We used a large series of Au25(SCnH2n+1)180 clusters (n=2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18) to study the effect of n and the presence of electrolytes on the redox potentials. The electrochemical results were analyzed in the framework of concentric‐capacitor models that were previously proposed to describe larger monolayer‐protected clusters. We found that the average dielectric constant of the monolayer (ϵm) is significantly larger than that of the ligand chains. The effective value of ϵm depends on n and is the result of contributions from ligands, solvent, and electrolyte. As n increased, ϵm decreased until a virtually constant value was attained for sufficiently long ligands. The electrochemically calculated HOMO–LUMO energy gap, conversely, does not depend on n and, therefore, ϵm. This energy gap is, within error, the same as that obtained from the optical spectra of the same clusters.
Gold standard: A large series of Au25(SCnH2n+1)180 clusters is used to study the effect of ligand length on redox potentials. Use of the concentric‐capacitor model shows that the average dielectric constant of the monolayer is significantly larger than that of the ligand chains. Its value depends on the number of carbon atoms of the ligand and is the result of contributions from ligands, solvent, and electrolyte. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2196-0216 2196-0216 |
DOI: | 10.1002/celc.201600276 |