Exploring Survey Response Process with Response Latency Data: Ideology and Political Sophistication
One of advantages of a CASI mode in conducting surveys is that it enables us to record and analyze people's response latency, a new type of dataset for survey researchers. Response latency data, which records seconds which it takes from the timing of interviewers' asking a question to the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Riron to hōhō 2015-01, Vol.30 (2), p.225 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | One of advantages of a CASI mode in conducting surveys is that it enables us to record and analyze people's response latency, a new type of dataset for survey researchers. Response latency data, which records seconds which it takes from the timing of interviewers' asking a question to the timing of respondents' answering it, is useful to explore processes to express answers in surveys that we cannot know through analyzing peoples' response only. By analyzing it, this study attempts to show possibilities for survey analysis. To do so, we investigate the relationship between people's ideology and a concept of political sophistication by comparing the survey answering process of perceptions of ideological positions with that of political knowledge. The results show that respondents answer questions of ideology and political knowledge, both of which are considered to be measurements of political sophistication, in very different cognitive processes; it takes longer time to correctly answer parties' ideological con ict, while correct answers for factual questions are expressed instantly. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0913-1442 1881-6495 |