MISREPRESENTATION OF THE NATIONAL WOMEN'S HOSPITAL IN AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND/PAUL AND BROOKES RESPOND
The article "The Rationalization of Unethical Research" by Paul and Brookes refers to a study of rural sharecroppers with syphilis in Tuskegee, Alabama, and a study of women with cervical carcinoma in situ (CIS) in Auckland, New Zealand.1 We show here that the article draws invalid paralle...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of public health (1971) 2016-07, Vol.106 (7), p.1208 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The article "The Rationalization of Unethical Research" by Paul and Brookes refers to a study of rural sharecroppers with syphilis in Tuskegee, Alabama, and a study of women with cervical carcinoma in situ (CIS) in Auckland, New Zealand.1 We show here that the article draws invalid parallels between these two situations and misrepresents what happened in Auckland, as did the 1988 judicial inquiry into the management of CIS at the National Women's Hospital in Auckland-the Cartwright Inquiry, for which Paul was an adviser. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0090-0036 |