Factor income taxation, growth, and investment specific technological change

Why do countries with different tax arrangements exhibit the same growth rate? We refer to this as a growth-tax puzzle. To explain the puzzle, we construct a tractable endogenous growth model with endogenous investment specific technological change (ISTC). Public and private capital stock externalit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Economic modelling 2016-09, Vol.57, p.133-152
Hauptverfasser: Bishnu, Monisankar, Ghate, Chetan, Gopalakrishnan, Pawan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Why do countries with different tax arrangements exhibit the same growth rate? We refer to this as a growth-tax puzzle. To explain the puzzle, we construct a tractable endogenous growth model with endogenous investment specific technological change (ISTC). Public and private capital stock externalities are assumed to augment ISTC. A specialized labor input exerts a positive externality in final good production. Our primary interest is to highlight the role of such externalities in explaining the puzzle. We show that the competitive equilibrium growth rate can be decomposed into a labor factor and a capital factor. Changes in factor income taxes, by affecting these factors, can have opposing effects leading to constancy in growth. Our model builds on the existing endogenous growth literature by providing an alternative, but compatible explanation for the offsetting growth effects of fiscal policy on growth observed in the data. •Why do economies with different tax arrangements have similar growth rates?•We build an endogenous growth model with endogenous ISTC to explain this.•Labor allocated towards ISTC has spillovers on final good production.•Private and public capitals have spillovers on ISTC.•Offsetting effects of taxes on labor and capital income explain the growth-tax puzzle.
ISSN:0264-9993
1873-6122
DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2016.04.007