Building Semi-Elastic Virtual Clusters for Cost-Effective HPC Cloud Resource Provisioning

Recent studies have found cloud environments increasingly appealing for executing HPC applications, including tightly coupled parallel simulations. At the same time, while public clouds offer elastic, on-demand resource provisioning and pay-as-you-go pricing, individual users setting up their on-dem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on parallel and distributed systems 2016-07, Vol.27 (7), p.1915-1928
Hauptverfasser: Niu, Shuangcheng, Zhai, Jidong, Ma, Xiaosong, Tang, Xiongchao, Chen, Wenguang, Zheng, Weimin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Recent studies have found cloud environments increasingly appealing for executing HPC applications, including tightly coupled parallel simulations. At the same time, while public clouds offer elastic, on-demand resource provisioning and pay-as-you-go pricing, individual users setting up their on-demand virtual clusters may not be able to take full advantage of common cost-saving opportunities, such as reserved instances. In this paper, we propose a Semi-Elastic Cluster (SEC) computing model for organizations to reserve and dynamically resize a virtual cloud-based cluster. We present a set of integrated batch scheduling plus resource scaling strategies uniquely enabled by SEC, as well as an online reserved instance provisioning algorithm based on job history. Our trace-driven simulation results show that such a model has a 61.0 percent cost saving than individual users acquiring and managing cloud resources without causing longer average job wait time. Moreover, to exploit the advantages of different public clouds, we also extend SEC to a multi-cloud environment, where SEC can get a lower cost than on any single cloud. We design and implement a prototype system of the SEC model and evaluate it in terms of management overhead and average job wait time. Experimental results show that the management overhead is negligible with respect to the job wait time.
ISSN:1045-9219
1558-2183
DOI:10.1109/TPDS.2015.2476459