Does bilingualism shape inhibitory control in the elderly?
•Elderly bilinguals and monolinguals do not differ in inhibitory skills.•Lifelong bilingualism does not improve executive functioning.•Proficiency in L2 does not modulate inhibitory or monitoring skills. Bilingualism has been argued to benefit executive functioning. However, recent research suggests...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of memory and language 2016-10, Vol.90, p.147-160 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Elderly bilinguals and monolinguals do not differ in inhibitory skills.•Lifelong bilingualism does not improve executive functioning.•Proficiency in L2 does not modulate inhibitory or monitoring skills.
Bilingualism has been argued to benefit executive functioning. However, recent research suggests that this advantage may stem from uncontrolled factors or incorrectly matched samples. In this study we test the effects of bilingualism on elderly lifelong bilinguals whose cognitive abilities are in decline, thus making any benefits more salient. Firstly we compare 24 bilinguals and 24 carefully matched monolinguals on verbal and the numerical Stroop tasks, obtaining no differences in monitoring or inhibitory measures. Secondly we explore the modulations that the proficiency in the L2 might cause to executive control functions, as measured by the same tasks, by testing 70 elderly bilinguals who vary in their L2 mastery from very low to perfectly fluent. Results show no modulation in any of the indices due to L2 proficiency. These results add to the growing body of evidence showing that the bilingual advantages might indeed be due to other factors rather than bilingualism. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0749-596X 1096-0821 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jml.2016.04.007 |