Comparing the adaptabilities of Brazilian adolescent students and adult workers

Many studies have verified the validity of the Career Adapt-Abilities Scale in diverse samples, both adolescents and adults. However, which abilities are more typical of each group remains unknown. This study investigated the CAAS factorial structure with Brazilian adolescents, to verify differences...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of vocational behavior 2016-06, Vol.94, p.20-27
Hauptverfasser: Ambiel, Rodolfo A.M., Carvalho, Lucas de Francisco, Martins, Gustavo Henrique, Tofoli, Lucilene
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Many studies have verified the validity of the Career Adapt-Abilities Scale in diverse samples, both adolescents and adults. However, which abilities are more typical of each group remains unknown. This study investigated the CAAS factorial structure with Brazilian adolescents, to verify differences between adolescents and adults and to explore the occurrence of differential item functioning analysis (DIF), by considering these two groups as independent variables. The two Brazilian samples were composed by adolescents (n=272) and by adult workers (n=404). Results confirmed the expected factorial structure in the adolescents sample and that adults scored higher on all CAAS factors. DIF analysis identified more items favored adults, as expected, but there was coherence in item content which favored each group. Nevertheless, there is no psychometric evidence supporting the need for different forms of CAAS for each group. Results are discussed by taking into account the practical implications of the findings. •Brazilian high school students and adult workers were assessed with CAAS.•The expected factorial structure of CAAS was confirmed in adolescents.•Adults scored higher than adolescents in all CAAS factors.•We identified items more likely to be endorsed by each group.•No psychometric evidence was found supporting the need for different CAAS format.
ISSN:0001-8791
1095-9084
DOI:10.1016/j.jvb.2016.02.005