179 WHAT IS THE VALUE OF C-REACTIVE PROTEIN FOR MANAGING “RULE OUT SEPSIS” IN HEALTHY TERM INFANTS SOON AFTER BIRTH?
BackgroundElevated CRP is associated with many conditions other than infection. Positive predictive value for infection of random CRP determinations soon after birth in healthy term infants (HTI) is poor. However, a decision to continue antibiotics (ATB), perform LP, and/or delay discharge is someti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of investigative medicine 2005-01, Vol.53 (1), p.S284-S284 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | BackgroundElevated CRP is associated with many conditions other than infection. Positive predictive value for infection of random CRP determinations soon after birth in healthy term infants (HTI) is poor. However, a decision to continue antibiotics (ATB), perform LP, and/or delay discharge is sometimes based on elevated CRP, regardless of clinical course and blood culture results.ObjectiveTo evaluate the use and duration of ATB in “HTI” when using or not using random CRP values as indicators of possible sepsis.MethodsHTI born at GMH receive a “rule out sepsis” workup based on prenatal risk assessment (maternal fever, rupture of membranes, chorioamnionitis, etc). Ampicillin and gentamicin are started pending results. We collected data prospectively in two periods to evaluate duration of ATB treatment, CRP values, number of LPs and hospital days in all HTI who received gentamicin. In period 1 (1/03- 8/03), ATB were to be continued > 48 hours if a CRP value was > 1.6 mg/dL at 2-24 hours, even with normal clinical course and negative cultures. If a repeat CRP at 36-48 hours was still elevated, ATB were continued in-hospital for ≥ 7 days and some infants underwent workup for meningitis at ≥ 48 hours. After extensive discussion of the literature, CRP measurements were discontinued from routine “rule out sepsis” workup. Period 2 is two months after implementing new guidelines, when ATB were discontinued based on culture results and clinical course. We compared utilization of resources (ATB use and duration, LPs, hospital stay, IVs), positive blood cultures, readmissions and mortality between the 2 periods.ResultsIn period 1, gentamicin was used in 192 HTI (7.3% of live births). Of these, 23 (12%) received ATB ≤ 2 days and 83 (43%) for ≤ 3 days (total ≤ 3 days: 105; 55%); 87 (45%) received ATB > 3 days based on CRP results; 3 were infected. After discontinuing CRP (period 2), 54 HTI (7.5% of all LB) received gentamicin; 50% of them received ATB ≤ 48 hours and 39% ≤ 3 days (total ≤ 3 days: 48; 89%; p < .05). Only 11% had ATB > 3 days (positive culture/clinical course); 1 was infected. Resource utilization was markedly less in period 2. No infant was readmitted or died of sepsis/meningitis in either group during periods 1 and 2.ConclusionElevated CRP values taken randomly early after birth are of no value for managing HTI with “rule out sepsis” and are associated with unnecessary longer course of ATB, add confusion to clinical management, and do not correlate with e |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1081-5589 1708-8267 |
DOI: | 10.2310/6650.2005.00006.178 |