Choice of inflation targeting: Some international evidence
•We discuss a country's choice of inflation targeting.•Countries’ decision of adoption of inflation targeting depends highly on their development stage.•For developed countries, the significant motive to choose inflation targeting is the desire to keep or enhance anti-inflation credibility.•Dev...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The North American journal of economics and finance 2016-04, Vol.36, p.350-369 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •We discuss a country's choice of inflation targeting.•Countries’ decision of adoption of inflation targeting depends highly on their development stage.•For developed countries, the significant motive to choose inflation targeting is the desire to keep or enhance anti-inflation credibility.•Developing countries with the large size of public debts are not likely to choose inflation targeting.
Inflation targeting has attracted attention to researchers and policy makers since the first attempt in New Zealand in 1990. This paper discusses a country's choice of inflation targeting by examining its driving forces with the dataset of 82 countries. The empirical result shows that countries’ decision of adoption of inflation targeting depends highly on their development stage. For high-income or developed countries, the significant motive of monetary authority to choose inflation targeting is the desire to keep or enhance anti-inflation credibility, and inflation targeting could be a natural option under more floats with the absence of nominal exchange rate anchor. On the other hand, low-income or developing countries with the large size of public debts are not likely to choose inflation targeting, so that fiscal fragility would discourage monetary authority to adopt restrictive monetary policy under inflation targeting. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1062-9408 1879-0860 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.najef.2016.03.001 |