089 Regression of myocardial oedema is related to improvement in myocardial contractility following reperfused acute myocardial infarction
IntroductionMyocardial oedema is a feature of reperfused acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and contributes to stunning of peri-infarct myocardium (the “area at risk”). Regression of oedema on T2 weighted (T2w) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is related to improved myocardial contrac...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2012-05, Vol.98 (Suppl 1), p.A51-A52 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | IntroductionMyocardial oedema is a feature of reperfused acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and contributes to stunning of peri-infarct myocardium (the “area at risk”). Regression of oedema on T2 weighted (T2w) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is related to improved myocardial contractility post AMI in animal models, but has not been established in man. We hypothesised that resolution of tissue oedema correlates with recovery of regional contractile function.MethodsPatients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for first ST-elevation AMI underwent CMR with T2w imaging, myocardial tagging and late gadolinium enhancement at 2, 30 and 90 days following reperfusion. Infarct size, regional circumferential strain, T2w signal intensity and volume of myocardial oedema were measured for infarct zone, peri-infarct zone and remote myocardium. Oedema and infarction were defined as zones with signal intensity 2 SDs above remote myocardium in T2w and LGE imaging respectively. T2w signal intensity was normalised to remote myocardium.Results30 patients had CMR imaging at all 3 time points with adequate image quality and sufficient peri-infarct oedema for quantitative analysis. Circumferential strain was significantly diminished in infarct and peri-infarct zones compared to remote myocardium (means −0.149 vs −0.184 vs −0.236, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1355-6037 1468-201X |
DOI: | 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-301877b.89 |