COMPARISON OF CLINICAL OUTCOMES BETWEEN BIORESORBABLE VASCULAR STENTS VERSUS CONVENTIONAL DRUG-ELUTING AND METALLIC STENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

COMPARISON OF CLINICAL OUTCOMES BETWEEN BIORESORBABLE VASCULAR STENTS VERSUS CONVENTIONAL DRUG-ELUTING AND METALLIC STENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

The following endpoints were assessed: all-cause mortality, cardiac death, patient-oriented major adverse cardiac events (POCE), device-oriented major adverse cardiac events (DOCE), any cause myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel MI (TVMI), target vessel revascularization (TVR) and target lesion...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2016-04, Vol.67 (13), p.57-57
Hauptverfasser: Banach, Maciej, Serban, Maria Corina, Sahebkar, Amirhossein, García-García, Hector M, Mikhailidis, Dimitri P, Martin, Seth, Daniel, Brie, Rysz, Jacek, Toth, Peter, Jones, Steven, Hasan, Rani, Mosteoru, Svetlana, Rifai, Mahmoud Al, Pencina, Michael, Serruys, Patrick W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Cardiology
Cardiovascular
Clinical outcomes
Confidence intervals
Heart attacks
Internal Medicine
Meta-analysis
Studies
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The following endpoints were assessed: all-cause mortality, cardiac death, patient-oriented major adverse cardiac events (POCE), device-oriented major adverse cardiac events (DOCE), any cause myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel MI (TVMI), target vessel revascularization (TVR) and target lesion revascularization (TLR).
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/S0735-1097(16)30058-4