PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, OPEN-LABEL, MULTICENTER TRIAL TO COMPARE BETWEEN PROVISIONAL VERSUS ROUTINE KISSING BALLOON TECHNIQUE AFTER MAIN VESSEL CROSSOVER STENTING FOR BIFURCATED LESIONS (PROTECT-SB): THE EXTENT AND SEVERITY OF MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA AND LONG TERM FOLLOW-UP

Background Little is known about the amount of ischemia and long-term outcome after provisional side-branch (SB) approach with/without final-kissing-balloon-inflation (FKI) Methods A total 120 patients with non-left main coronary bifurcations were randomized to 2 arms, stratified by target-vessels b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2016-04, Vol.67 (13), p.103-103
Hauptverfasser: Yamawaki, Masahiro, Fujita, Masaki, Sasaki, Shinya, Tsurugida, Masanori, Araki, Motoharu, Ishimori, Hiroshi, Nakano, Masatsugu, Hirano, Keisuke, Ito, Yoshiaki, Tsukahara, Reiko, Muramatsu, Toshiya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Little is known about the amount of ischemia and long-term outcome after provisional side-branch (SB) approach with/without final-kissing-balloon-inflation (FKI) Methods A total 120 patients with non-left main coronary bifurcations were randomized to 2 arms, stratified by target-vessels between Feb.2010 and May 2012: (1) provisional-FKI-group: FKI only when SB-flow was TIMI
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/S0735-1097(16)30104-8