SP1-58 Malnutrition, quality of life and cancer: association between different nutritional parameters

IntroductionWeight loss is a frequent complication in patients with cancer, and it is present in almost 85% of patients in some specific kinds of tumour. Malnutrition, decreased functional capacity and quality of life (QOL) contribute to an increased morbidity and mortality in these patients.Objecti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979) 2011-08, Vol.65 (Suppl 1), p.A390-A390
Hauptverfasser: Orlandi, S P, Assunção, M C F, Pastore, C A, Gonzalez, M C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:IntroductionWeight loss is a frequent complication in patients with cancer, and it is present in almost 85% of patients in some specific kinds of tumour. Malnutrition, decreased functional capacity and quality of life (QOL) contribute to an increased morbidity and mortality in these patients.ObjectivesTo evaluate the association among nutritional status, quality of life, index of fat free mass (FFMI) and functional capacity in patients undergoing chemotherapy.MethodsA prospective study was conducted in patients before the first chemotherapy course in the Hospital of Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil. Nutritional status was determined by Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment and quality of life by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire. Bioelectrical impedance analysis and hand grip strength (HGS) were performed to evaluate FFMI and functional capacity, respectively.Results75 patients were evaluated, 74.7% had cancer of the digestive system. Only 12.8% of the patients were classified as well nourished. HGS median was 26 kg (IQR:18; 32 kg) FFMI median was 17.5 kg/m2 (IQR:16.1; 18.8 kg/m2). Severely malnourished patients had a worse functional capacity (p=0.01); lower FFMI (p=0.005) and lower general QOF scores (p=0.03) than the nourished ones. A significant positive correlation was found between IFFM and HGS (r=0.51; p
ISSN:0143-005X
1470-2738
DOI:10.1136/jech.2011.142976n.35