AB0792 Patient satisfaction with rheumatology services across three clinical sites in kent (uk)

Background Patient satisfaction is an important constituent of health care and this is widely acknowledged by health care managers and providers. In the current politico-economic environment with greater devolution of powers from the centre to clinical commissioning groups (CCG’s) and availability o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2013-06, Vol.72 (Suppl 3), p.A1032-A1033
1. Verfasser: Srirangan, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Patient satisfaction is an important constituent of health care and this is widely acknowledged by health care managers and providers. In the current politico-economic environment with greater devolution of powers from the centre to clinical commissioning groups (CCG’s) and availability of a choice of providers rheumatology departments across the country have to demonstrate that the services provided by them are deemed suitable and satisfactory by the consumers (patients). Objectives The objective was to investigate the level of satisfaction with care amongst patients attending rheumatology outpatient clinics in Medway Maritime Hospital, Darent Valley Hospital and Sittingbourne Memorial hospital. Methods A survey questionnaire with 31 questions was designed after consultation within the department. The anonymous survey was handed out randomly to 110 patients attending follow up appointments across three sites (Medway Maritime Hospital, Darent Valley hospital, Sittingbourne Memorial Hospital) over a 4 week period(November- December 2012). The survey forms were handed out to patients attending 27 rheumatology clinics. The responses were collated and data entered into an excel spread sheet and assessed. For ease of analysis results from Medway Maritime Hospital and Sittingbourne Memorial Hospital (part of the same trust)were analysed together(as MMH) while Darent Valley Hospital was analysed separately(as DVH). Results Of the 110 patients surveyed – 86 patients responded (78%); 9 incomplete forms were excluded and 77 forms were analysed. 40 females and 37 males across 3 sites. Patients surveyed had a wide range of rheumatological disorders. Patient ease of getting an appointment- 87% (MMH) very easily ; while 13 % had some difficulty 81% (DVH) very easily ; while 19 % had some difficulty Follow up appointments never changed or changed once by the hospital- 89% (MMH) 85% (DVH) Follow up appointments changed more than once by the hospital- 11% (MMH) 15% (DVH) Adequate notice given to patient while changing appointments: 100% (MMH), 87% (DVH) Patients seen within 15 minutes of appointment- 73%(MMH) 67%(DVH) Patients fully understanding their diagnosis- 97.4%(MMH) 77%(DVH) Patients given enough information on drug treatment- 95.4%(MMH) 79%(DVH) Patients given enough time to ask questions- 100%(MMH) 84.6%(DVH) While 100% patients in MMH felt that their clinician listened to them the numbers for DVH were 92%. While 100% of the patients in MMH could under
ISSN:0003-4967
1468-2060
DOI:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.3114