Influence of Different Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens on Response, Prognosis, and Complication Rate in Patients with Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma

Background Perioperative chemotherapy improves survival in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer, but the optimal treatment regimen remains unclear. More intensive chemotherapy may improve outcome, but also increase toxicity and complications. Methods A total of 843 patients were included in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2015-12, Vol.22 (Suppl 3), p.905-914
Hauptverfasser: Springfeld, Christoph, Wiecha, Christiane, Kunzmann, Romy, Heger, Ulrike, Weichert, Wilko, Langer, Rupert, Stange, Annika, Blank, Susanne, Sisic, Leila, Schmidt, Thomas, Lordick, Florian, Jäger, Dirk, Grenacher, Lars, Bruckner, Tom, Büchler, Markus W., Ott, Katja
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Perioperative chemotherapy improves survival in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer, but the optimal treatment regimen remains unclear. More intensive chemotherapy may improve outcome, but also increase toxicity and complications. Methods A total of 843 patients were included in this retrospective study and stratified in 4 groups: doublet therapy with cisplatin or oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (groups A/B) or triplet therapy with additional epirubicin or taxane (groups C/D). The influence of the different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens on response, prognosis, and complications was assessed. Results Clinical and pathological response were associated with longer overall survival (OS; p  
ISSN:1068-9265
1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-015-4617-x