Allergy Misconceptions Among Attending Physicians, Resident Physicians and Mid-Level Providers
The means for pediatric and internal medicine providers were 3.26 and 2.84 respectively. 44.6% correctly identified epinephrine as the first line treatment for anaphylaxis. 8.9% of providers were aware that shellfish, iodine, and artificial dye allergies have no impact on imaging studies performed w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 2016-02, Vol.137 (2), p.AB284-AB284 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The means for pediatric and internal medicine providers were 3.26 and 2.84 respectively. 44.6% correctly identified epinephrine as the first line treatment for anaphylaxis. 8.9% of providers were aware that shellfish, iodine, and artificial dye allergies have no impact on imaging studies performed with radiocontrast. 32.40% and 35.19% of primary care providers incorrectly identified egg allergy as a contraindication to administration of MMR and Influenza vaccines respectively. 36.22% of providers answered at least 4 out of 9 questions correctly. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0091-6749 1097-6825 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.12.1175 |