28 Subat Süreci: 'Post-Modern Darbe'nin Sosyo-Politik Dinamikleri ve Toplum Destegi

In the history of Turkish, the military tended to seek sup-port from a part of the community in order to make their interference legimate. This was done by speaking to a part of community via me-dia or searing themselves as the real defender of the government and then they made their interference. Seeing what they did as legimate with regard to this condition, did they gain the real support from the community? Particularly, the west-sided history investigations tend to support the idea that the changes and reforms are supported by the community. Is it as such for Turkey? People believe that the reforms in the history of Modern Turkish come to the existence due to the su-perior interference. For this reason, all of these questions and prob-lems have had us argue whether the interference is made in legitimate condition or not. In this study, to limit the aspects of the investigation, instead of investigating all of the radical changes / interferences in the Modern Turkish history, the interference of "28 February" is investi-gated with the aspect of whether this investigation was made with community-based purpose or not.