Following the Ants: Development of Short Scales for Proactive Personality and Supervisor Support by Ant Colony Optimization
Employees' innovative work is a facet of proactive work behavior that is of increasing interest to industrial and organizational psychologists. As proactive personality and supervisor support are key predictors of innovative work behavior, reliable, and valid employee ratings of these two const...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of psychological assessment : official organ of the European Association of Psychological Assessment 2017-11, Vol.33 (6), p.409-421 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Employees' innovative work is a facet of proactive
work behavior that is of increasing interest to industrial and organizational
psychologists. As proactive personality and supervisor support are key
predictors of innovative work behavior, reliable, and valid employee ratings of
these two constructs are crucial for organizations' planning of personnel
development measures. However, the time for assessments is often limited. The
present study therefore aimed at constructing reliable short scales of two
measures of proactive personality and supervisor support. For this purpose, we
compared an innovative approach of item selection, namely Ant Colony
Optimization (ACO; Leite, Huang,
& Marcoulides, 2008) and classical item selection procedures. For
proactive personality, the two item selection approaches provided similar
results. Both five-item short forms showed a satisfactory reliability and a
small, however negligible loss of criterion validity. For a two-dimensional
supervisor support scale, ACO found a reliable and valid short form.
Psychometric properties of the short version were in accordance with those of
the parent form. A manual supervisor support short form revealed a rather poor
model fit and a serious loss of validity. We discuss benefits and shortcomings
of ACO compared to classical item selection approaches and recommendations for
the application of ACO. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1015-5759 2151-2426 |
DOI: | 10.1027/1015-5759/a000299 |