“Historical Demography”/“Population History” in Germany, c. 1950-1980
The paper investigates the period between the collapse of the Third Reich and the break through of the Historical Social Science (Historische Sozialwissenschaft) in the Federal Republic of Germany in the 1970s. I suggest that this phase assigned a decisive transformation process, in which West Germa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Romanian journal of population studies 2013-07, Vol.7 (2), p.63-73 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The paper investigates the period between the collapse of the Third
Reich and the break through of the Historical Social Science (Historische
Sozialwissenschaft) in the Federal Republic of Germany in the 1970s. I suggest that
this phase assigned a decisive transformation process, in which West German
social historians strived for their reintegration in West European and North
American historiographical discourse. Closely linked to this overall epistemic
change, historiographical population research in West Germany sought to gain
new ground. While the established “Population History” stood for the macroanalytical
and to some extent “organic” traditions of German Sociology”,
“demography” in general and particularly “Historical Demography” seemingly
referred to the liberal-statistical “Western” conceptualization of social structure. In
the early Federal Republic, however, historical population research was thoroughly
burdened by its völkisch legacy. As it is shown in the present paper, this was one of
the main reasons for its low acceptance in historiographical discourse. Even
though, the 1950s and 1960s cannot be viewed as “blind spots” in the
development of historical population research in Germany: On the contrary,
historians such as Erich Keyser and especially Wolfgang Köllmann debated
controversially, how “Population History” should change its methodological
approaches. Not least, both of them sought to resume and partly to intensify
scientific contacts to their West European colleagues. By accentuating the latter,
the paper goes clearly beyond the present historical research on German
“Population History”: The key question linked up with it is, to which degree
transnational scientific cooperation of German, English, and French historians
remodeled “Population History” and even created new ground for “Historical Demography” within German Historical Social Science. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1843-5998 |