The liquidity premium in CDS transaction prices: Do frictions matter?
•We use a proprietary set of individual CDS transactions.•We show that CDS prices contain sizeable, counterparty-specific liquidity premiums.•We attribute the liquidity premium to specific market frictions.•Asymmetric information does not play a role.•Buy-side investors pay a significantly higher pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of banking & finance 2015-12, Vol.61, p.184-205 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •We use a proprietary set of individual CDS transactions.•We show that CDS prices contain sizeable, counterparty-specific liquidity premiums.•We attribute the liquidity premium to specific market frictions.•Asymmetric information does not play a role.•Buy-side investors pay a significantly higher price for liquidity than dealers.
Based on individual CDS transactions cleared by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation, we show that illiquidity strongly affects credit default swap premiums. We identify the following effects: first, transaction direction affects prices, as buy (sell) orders lead to premium increases (decreases). Second, larger transactions have a higher price impact. This finding stands in stark contrast to corporate bond markets. Third, traders charge higher premiums as a price for liquidity provision, not as compensation for asymmetric information. Fourth, buy-side investors pay significantly higher prices than dealers for demanding liquidity. Finally, inventory risk seems to matter little in explaining liquidity premiums. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0378-4266 1872-6372 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.08.024 |