The Gaps in Cardiac Rehabilitation Referral
Additionally, patient-level factors alone cannot explain the significant disparities in the use of CR (57.9% to 61.2%) compared with other quality-of-care indexes, such as antiplatelet (97% to 97.5%), beta-blocker (84.8%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker (79.6...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2015-12, Vol.66 (22), p.2574-2574 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Additionally, patient-level factors alone cannot explain the significant disparities in the use of CR (57.9% to 61.2%) compared with other quality-of-care indexes, such as antiplatelet (97% to 97.5%), beta-blocker (84.8%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker (79.6%), and statin (89.8%) therapies (1). More importantly, most of the reported patient-level factors that are perceived to be barriers to CR referral (e.g., age, comorbidities, insurance status, distance from CR center) are generally not reversible. [...]it is necessary to assess the role of other reversible factors that can be potentially corrected and overcome. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0735-1097 1558-3597 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1359 |