The Gaps in Cardiac Rehabilitation Referral

Additionally, patient-level factors alone cannot explain the significant disparities in the use of CR (57.9% to 61.2%) compared with other quality-of-care indexes, such as antiplatelet (97% to 97.5%), beta-blocker (84.8%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker (79.6...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2015-12, Vol.66 (22), p.2574-2574
Hauptverfasser: Dahhan, Ali, MD, Maddox, William R., MD, Sharma, Gyanendra K., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Additionally, patient-level factors alone cannot explain the significant disparities in the use of CR (57.9% to 61.2%) compared with other quality-of-care indexes, such as antiplatelet (97% to 97.5%), beta-blocker (84.8%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker (79.6%), and statin (89.8%) therapies (1). More importantly, most of the reported patient-level factors that are perceived to be barriers to CR referral (e.g., age, comorbidities, insurance status, distance from CR center) are generally not reversible. [...]it is necessary to assess the role of other reversible factors that can be potentially corrected and overcome.
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1359