Cetuximab plus pemetrexed as second-line therapy for fluorouracil-based pre-treated metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab and pemetrexed as the second-line treatment for advanced esophageal cancer patients, who had undergone treatment with the standard cisplatin and 5-FU regimens. Methods A total of 29 patients accepted this treatment....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology 2015-10, Vol.76 (4), p.829-834
Hauptverfasser: Tian, Jing, Shang, Ming, Shi, Sheng-Bin, Han, Yong, Xu, Jun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab and pemetrexed as the second-line treatment for advanced esophageal cancer patients, who had undergone treatment with the standard cisplatin and 5-FU regimens. Methods A total of 29 patients accepted this treatment. Cetuximab was administered at an initial dose of 400 mg/m 2 IV followed by weekly doses of 250 mg/m 2 IV, whereas pemetrexed 500 mg/m 2 was administered on day 1 every 3 weeks. Results Twelve patients (41.4 %) presented PR, ten (34.5 %) had SD, and seven (24.1 %) had PD. The response rate was 41.4 %. The median PFS was 4.5 months (95 % CI 4.1–4.9), and the median OS was 9.4 months (95 % CI 8.4–10.5). The expression levels of serum miR-335 were determined, and the subsequent analysis suggested that PFS was significantly different between the patients with higher level of serum miR-335 and those with low level of serum miR-335. The former had a PFS of 4.9 months (95 % CI 4.2–5.7) and the latter 4.1 months (95 % CI 3.7–4.5) (log rank = 0.025). None of the patients experienced grade 4 toxicity. Twenty-four patients presented rash. Conclusions A combination of cetuximab plus pemetrexed was marginally effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma as the second-line treatment.
ISSN:0344-5704
1432-0843
DOI:10.1007/s00280-015-2854-0