Cost-utility in medical intensive care patients. Rationalizing ongoing care and timing of discharge from intensive care

Intensive care unit (ICU) treatment costs pose special challenges in developing countries. To determine the prognostic value of the "utility" score and evaluate the relationship of willingness to pay assessment to utility score during ICU admission. We performed a prospective study spannin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the American Thoracic Society 2015-07, Vol.12 (7), p.1058-1065
Hauptverfasser: Thomas, Kurien, Peter, John Victor, Christina, Jony, Jagadish, Anna Revathi, Rajan, Amala, Lionel, Prabha, Jeyaseelan, Lakshmanan, Yadav, Bijesh, John, George, Pichamuthu, Kishore, Chacko, Binila, Pari, Priscilla, Murugesan, Thilagavathi, Rajendran, Kavitha, John, Anu, Sathyendra, Sowmya, Iyyadurai, Ramya, Jasmine, Sudha, Karthik, Rajiv, Mathuram, Alice, Hansdak, Samuel George, Abhilash, Kundavaram Paul P, Kumar, Shuba, John, K R, Sudarsanam, Thambu David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Intensive care unit (ICU) treatment costs pose special challenges in developing countries. To determine the prognostic value of the "utility" score and evaluate the relationship of willingness to pay assessment to utility score during ICU admission. We performed a prospective study spanning 12 months in a 24-bed medical ICU in India. Treatment cost was estimated by direct measurement. Global utility score was assessed daily by healthcare providers on a Likert scale (0-1 in increments of 0.1, with 0 indicating death/severe disability and 1 indicating cure/perfect health). The sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of utility in predicting ICU mortality was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to compare Day 2 utility with APACHE II. The caregiver's willingness to pay for treatment was assessed on alternate days using the bidding method by presenting a cost bid. Based on the response ("yes" or "no"), bids were increased or decreased in a prespecified manner until a final bid value was reached. Simultaneously, treating doctors were asked how much institutional funds they would be willing to spend for treatment. Primary diagnosis in 499 patients included infection (26%) and poisoning (21%). The mean (SD) APACHE II score was 13.9 (5.8); 86% were ventilated. ICU stay was 7.8 (5.5) days. ICU mortality was 23.9% (95% confidence interval, 20.3-27.8). Survival without disability was 8.3% (2/24) for Day 2 utility score ≤0.3 and 95.8% (53/56) for Day 5 score >0.8 (P 
ISSN:2329-6933
2325-6621
DOI:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201411-527OC