Lack of correlation between 1,5-anhydroglucitol assay and oral glucose tolerance test in patients with cystic fibrosis

To determine whether the 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) assay, which reflects serum glucose levels during the preceding 2 weeks, could be used as an alternative to the current standard screening test for cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD)-the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Serum 1,5-AG, hemo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Endocrine practice 2010-03, Vol.16 (2), p.167-170
Hauptverfasser: Kinnaird, Kate E H, Sauerwein, Tom J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To determine whether the 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) assay, which reflects serum glucose levels during the preceding 2 weeks, could be used as an alternative to the current standard screening test for cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD)-the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Serum 1,5-AG, hemoglobin A1c (A1C), fructosamine, and glucose at various time intervals during the OGTT were measured in 10 patients, 19 to 36 years old, with cystic fibrosis. Correlation coefficients were calculated to compare 1,5-AG with A1C, fructosamine, and serum glucose levels during the OGTT, and the mean 1,5-AG, A1C, and fructosamine for normal glucose tolerance, impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and CFRD were compared statistically. On the basis of the 120-minute OGTT, 1 of the 10 study subjects had CFRD and 4 had IGT. The mean 1,5-AG for patients with normal glucose tolerance was not significantly different from that for patients with IGT (P = .063). The 1,5-AG value was not significantly correlated with serum glucose during the OGTT, A1C, or fructosamine. In this pilot study, we found no significant correlation between 1,5-AG and glucose values during the OGTT or between 1,5-AG and other glycemic markers. Hence, the utility of the 1,5-AG assay for screening for CFRD in the population of patients with cystic fibrosis may be limited.
ISSN:1530-891X
1934-2403
DOI:10.4158/EP09149.OR