Pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of absorbed testosterone after administration of a 1.62% testosterone gel to different application sites in men with hypogonadism

To determine the pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, and safety of a new formulation (1.62%) of testosterone gel that produces eugonadal serum testosterone levels with use of a lower amount of gel than the currently available 1% gels. In an open-label, randomized, 3-way crossover study, 36 male patie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Endocrine practice 2011-07, Vol.17 (4), p.574-583
Hauptverfasser: Miller, Jodi, Britto, Margaret, Fitzpatrick, Sherahe, McWhirter, Cecilia, Testino, Samuel A, Brennan, John J, Zumbrunnen, Troy L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To determine the pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, and safety of a new formulation (1.62%) of testosterone gel that produces eugonadal serum testosterone levels with use of a lower amount of gel than the currently available 1% gels. In an open-label, randomized, 3-way crossover study, 36 male patients with hypogonadism applied 5 g of 1.62% testosterone gel (81 mg of testosterone) once daily to the abdomen, to the upper arms/shoulders, or alternating between both sites per an established schedule for 7 days. Serum levels of testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, and estradiol were measured and used to compare the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of the 3 treatments. Each application method produced average serum testosterone concentrations within the eugonadal range (300 to 1,000 ng/dL), and steady-state testosterone concentrations were achieved after 2 days of gel application to either the abdomen or the upper arms/shoulders. When testosterone gel was applied to the abdomen, approximately 30% to 40% lower bioavailability (based on area under the serum concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours) was observed in comparison with application to the upper arms/shoulders. The 1.62% testosterone gel was found to be safe and well tolerated in men with hypogonadism. Although lower testosterone bioavailability was observed after abdominal application of 1.62% testosterone gel in comparison with application to the upper arms/shoulders, application to either site yielded eugonadal levels of serum testosterone.
ISSN:1530-891X
1934-2403
DOI:10.4158/EP10192.OR