‘Interpretation’ and the ‘Empirical’: Similarities between theoretical and empirical political science
[...]political theory', he continues, 'no more than English literature or any other academic endeavor, can be defined in terms of possessing a special capacity to specify the substance of what is politically right or just' (p. 677). [...]he finds that 'much of political theory, i...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Contemporary political theory 2015-08, Vol.14 (3), p.256-275 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 275 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 256 |
| container_title | Contemporary political theory |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | Passavant, Paul A Gunnell, John |
| description | [...]political theory', he continues, 'no more than English literature or any other academic endeavor, can be defined in terms of possessing a special capacity to specify the substance of what is politically right or just' (p. 677). [...]he finds that 'much of political theory, in its dedication to transpolitical foundations of judgment, manifests an elitist, antidemocratic bias', that echoes nineteenth century moralism (p. 678). [...]as long as the institutions structuring distributions remain in force, or are not considered pertinent matters of normative inquiry, a one-time redistribution will fail truly to produce justice as problematic institutions reproduce, sooner or later, unjust distributions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1057/cpt.2014.36 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1698899939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3758297541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-b9b4ce428af7e75c4d1d3024f6675358ba211f6ec22bb94fd3a0444e1cd263fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM9KxDAQxoMouK6efIGCR-2af00bbyKrLix4UM8hTaeapdvWJIt48zH09XwS062CB08z883vm4EPoWOCZwRn-bnpw4xiwmdM7KAJ4blIJWNid9vjtJCE76MD71cYU1xwOUHt1_vHog3gegdBB9tF4TPRbZWEZ0jicr7urbNGN1G_SO7t2jba2WDBJyWEV4B2ILvoHqCtE34tSd81dtS9sdAaOER7tW48HP3UKXq8nj9c3abLu5vF1eUyNTQTIS1lyQ1wWug6hzwzvCIVw5TXQuQZy4pSU0JqAYbSspS8rpjGnHMgpqKCxXGKTsa7veteNuCDWnUb18aXighZFFJKJiN1OlLGdd47qFXv7Fq7N0WwGgJVMVA1BKqYiPTZSPtItU_g_tz8B_8GAOd9eQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1698899939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>‘Interpretation’ and the ‘Empirical’: Similarities between theoretical and empirical political science</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Passavant, Paul A ; Gunnell, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Passavant, Paul A ; Gunnell, John</creatorcontrib><description>[...]political theory', he continues, 'no more than English literature or any other academic endeavor, can be defined in terms of possessing a special capacity to specify the substance of what is politically right or just' (p. 677). [...]he finds that 'much of political theory, in its dedication to transpolitical foundations of judgment, manifests an elitist, antidemocratic bias', that echoes nineteenth century moralism (p. 678). [...]as long as the institutions structuring distributions remain in force, or are not considered pertinent matters of normative inquiry, a one-time redistribution will fail truly to produce justice as problematic institutions reproduce, sooner or later, unjust distributions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-8914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-9336</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/cpt.2014.36</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><subject>Critical Exchange ; Critical Theory ; Feminism ; Mythology ; oace ; Patriarchy ; Political Philosophy ; Political representation ; Political Science ; Political Science and International Relations ; Political Science and International Studies ; Political Theory ; Politics ; Poststructuralism ; Preferences ; Studies ; Theory</subject><ispartof>Contemporary political theory, 2015-08, Vol.14 (3), p.256-275</ispartof><rights>Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2014</rights><rights>Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-b9b4ce428af7e75c4d1d3024f6675358ba211f6ec22bb94fd3a0444e1cd263fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/cpt.2014.36$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1057/cpt.2014.36$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Passavant, Paul A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunnell, John</creatorcontrib><title>‘Interpretation’ and the ‘Empirical’: Similarities between theoretical and empirical political science</title><title>Contemporary political theory</title><addtitle>Contemp Polit Theory</addtitle><description>[...]political theory', he continues, 'no more than English literature or any other academic endeavor, can be defined in terms of possessing a special capacity to specify the substance of what is politically right or just' (p. 677). [...]he finds that 'much of political theory, in its dedication to transpolitical foundations of judgment, manifests an elitist, antidemocratic bias', that echoes nineteenth century moralism (p. 678). [...]as long as the institutions structuring distributions remain in force, or are not considered pertinent matters of normative inquiry, a one-time redistribution will fail truly to produce justice as problematic institutions reproduce, sooner or later, unjust distributions.</description><subject>Critical Exchange</subject><subject>Critical Theory</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Mythology</subject><subject>oace</subject><subject>Patriarchy</subject><subject>Political Philosophy</subject><subject>Political representation</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Political Science and International Relations</subject><subject>Political Science and International Studies</subject><subject>Political Theory</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Poststructuralism</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>1470-8914</issn><issn>1476-9336</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM9KxDAQxoMouK6efIGCR-2af00bbyKrLix4UM8hTaeapdvWJIt48zH09XwS062CB08z883vm4EPoWOCZwRn-bnpw4xiwmdM7KAJ4blIJWNid9vjtJCE76MD71cYU1xwOUHt1_vHog3gegdBB9tF4TPRbZWEZ0jicr7urbNGN1G_SO7t2jba2WDBJyWEV4B2ILvoHqCtE34tSd81dtS9sdAaOER7tW48HP3UKXq8nj9c3abLu5vF1eUyNTQTIS1lyQ1wWug6hzwzvCIVw5TXQuQZy4pSU0JqAYbSspS8rpjGnHMgpqKCxXGKTsa7veteNuCDWnUb18aXighZFFJKJiN1OlLGdd47qFXv7Fq7N0WwGgJVMVA1BKqYiPTZSPtItU_g_tz8B_8GAOd9eQ</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Passavant, Paul A</creator><creator>Gunnell, John</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>‘Interpretation’ and the ‘Empirical’: Similarities between theoretical and empirical political science</title><author>Passavant, Paul A ; Gunnell, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-b9b4ce428af7e75c4d1d3024f6675358ba211f6ec22bb94fd3a0444e1cd263fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Critical Exchange</topic><topic>Critical Theory</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Mythology</topic><topic>oace</topic><topic>Patriarchy</topic><topic>Political Philosophy</topic><topic>Political representation</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Political Science and International Relations</topic><topic>Political Science and International Studies</topic><topic>Political Theory</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Poststructuralism</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Passavant, Paul A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunnell, John</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Access via Art, Design & Architecture Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Contemporary political theory</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Passavant, Paul A</au><au>Gunnell, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>‘Interpretation’ and the ‘Empirical’: Similarities between theoretical and empirical political science</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary political theory</jtitle><stitle>Contemp Polit Theory</stitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>256</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>256-275</pages><issn>1470-8914</issn><eissn>1476-9336</eissn><abstract>[...]political theory', he continues, 'no more than English literature or any other academic endeavor, can be defined in terms of possessing a special capacity to specify the substance of what is politically right or just' (p. 677). [...]he finds that 'much of political theory, in its dedication to transpolitical foundations of judgment, manifests an elitist, antidemocratic bias', that echoes nineteenth century moralism (p. 678). [...]as long as the institutions structuring distributions remain in force, or are not considered pertinent matters of normative inquiry, a one-time redistribution will fail truly to produce justice as problematic institutions reproduce, sooner or later, unjust distributions.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan UK</pub><doi>10.1057/cpt.2014.36</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1470-8914 |
| ispartof | Contemporary political theory, 2015-08, Vol.14 (3), p.256-275 |
| issn | 1470-8914 1476-9336 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1698899939 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Critical Exchange Critical Theory Feminism Mythology oace Patriarchy Political Philosophy Political representation Political Science Political Science and International Relations Political Science and International Studies Political Theory Politics Poststructuralism Preferences Studies Theory |
| title | ‘Interpretation’ and the ‘Empirical’: Similarities between theoretical and empirical political science |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T05%3A22%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%98Interpretation%E2%80%99%20and%20the%20%E2%80%98Empirical%E2%80%99:%20Similarities%20between%20theoretical%20and%20empirical%20political%20science&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20political%20theory&rft.au=Passavant,%20Paul%20A&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=256&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=256-275&rft.issn=1470-8914&rft.eissn=1476-9336&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/cpt.2014.36&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3758297541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1698899939&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |