WHICH CLINICAL RISK SCORING METHOD BEST PREDICTS THE PREVALENCE AND PROGNOSIS OF CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE? RESULTS FROM A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER INTERNATIONAL STUDY OF 1,096 PATIENTS

WHICH CLINICAL RISK SCORING METHOD BEST PREDICTS THE PREVALENCE AND PROGNOSIS OF CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE? RESULTS FROM A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER INTERNATIONAL STUDY OF 1,096 PATIENTS

To date, the comparative ability of the ASCVD, Framingham risk score (FRS), or NCEP ATP III score to diagnose obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) or prognostic future outcomes remains untested.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2015-03, Vol.65 (10), p.A1474-A1474
Hauptverfasser: Cho, Iksung, Valenti, Valentina, Achenbach, Stephan, Berman, Daniel, Budoff, Matthew, Callister, Tracy, Chang, Hyuk-Jae, Al-Mallah, Mouaz, Cademartiri, Filippo, Chinnaiyan, Kavitha, DeLago, Augustin, Villines, Todd, Hadamitzky, Martin, Hausleiter, Joerg, Leipsic, Jonathan, Shaw, Leslee, Kaufmann, Philipp, Cury, Ricardo, Feuchtner, Gudrun, Kim, Yong-Jin, Maffei, Erica, Raff, Gilbert, Pontone, Gianluca, Andreini, Daniele, Min, James
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Cardiology
Cardiovascular
Cardiovascular disease
Coronary vessels
Heart attacks
Internal Medicine
Methods
Mortality
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To date, the comparative ability of the ASCVD, Framingham risk score (FRS), or NCEP ATP III score to diagnose obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) or prognostic future outcomes remains untested.
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/S0735-1097(15)61474-7