Sexual harassment training: Person versus machine
Computer-based training is rapidly being implemented in organizations. Many advantages of this approach have been suggested (e.g., self-paced instruction, uniform content, and long-run cost efficiency) along with several potential disadvantages (e.g., noncompletion rates, computer availability). Des...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Public personnel management 2011-03, Vol.40 (1), p.47-62 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Computer-based training is rapidly being implemented in organizations. Many advantages of this approach have been suggested (e.g., self-paced instruction, uniform content, and long-run cost efficiency) along with several potential disadvantages (e.g., noncompletion rates, computer availability). Despite the purported advantages of computer-based training, little research has examined the effect of computer-based training on learning. This field study systematically compared computer-based sexual harassment training with traditional instructor-led training. Overall, the results suggested that having a training course on sexual harassment, regardless of method of training, increased learning among the university employees who participated in these sessions. Reactions to both types of training were positive. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0091-0260 1945-7421 |
DOI: | 10.1177/009102601104000104 |