Reply

Dr. Sipahi and colleagues express concern about the discrepancy of our observational study with randomized controlled studies, and point to residual confounding as a possible explanation. [...]we found reassurance in the fact that estimates changed only modestly upon adjustment for key risk factors...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2013-09, Vol.62 (10), p.946
Hauptverfasser: Larsen, Torben Bjerregaard, Rasmussen, Lars Hvilsted, Skjøth, Flemming, Due, Karen Margrete, Callréus, Torbjörn, Rosenzweig, Mary, Lip, Gregory YH
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Dr. Sipahi and colleagues express concern about the discrepancy of our observational study with randomized controlled studies, and point to residual confounding as a possible explanation. [...]we found reassurance in the fact that estimates changed only modestly upon adjustment for key risk factors for the outcome.
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.067